Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.5K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

96
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
96
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects01:29

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

161
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
161
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

139
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
139
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.7K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.7K
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

207
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
207

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post-IMvigor011 Era: CtDNA-Guided Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Stratification in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Cancer management and research·2026
Same author

Post-traumatic growth among parents of burn-injured children: A cross-sectional survey.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same author

Environmental uncertainty shapes human effort learning.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Amygdala-putamen connectivity links gratitude to greater well-being.

Dialogues in clinical neuroscience·2026
Same author

Early Shedding of Sepals Promotes Cross-Pollination of <i>Actaea erythrocarpa</i> (Ranunculaceae).

Biology·2026
Same author

Self-association enhances early attentional selection through automatic prioritization of socially salient signals.

eLife·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Overlap in processing advantages for minimal ingroups and the self.

Florence E Enock1,2, Miles R C Hewstone3, Patricia L Lockwood4,5,6

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. Florence.Enock@york.ac.uk.

Scientific Reports
|November 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Even random group assignments quickly create ingroup biases, influencing perception. These biases share cognitive mechanisms with self-prioritization, impacting how we process social information.

More Related Videos

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

990

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

990

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Cognitive biases influence perception and social interactions.
  • Self and ingroup information receive prioritized processing, forming key biases.
  • Ingroup biases can arise from minimal group assignments, not just established groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Examine cognitive mechanisms of minimal group effects and self-prioritization.
  • Investigate if minimal group allocation leads to early processing advantages.
  • Determine the relationship between self-biases and ingroup-biases.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a social associative matching paradigm across three experiments.
  • Assessed response time and sensitivity (d-prime) for ingroup-associated stimuli.
  • Analyzed correlations between self-biases and ingroup-biases.

Main Results:

  • Found significant processing advantages for minimal ingroup-associated stimuli.
  • Observed positive correlations between self-biases and ingroup-biases.
  • Demonstrated self-advantage dominance when self and ingroup associations competed.

Conclusions:

  • Minimal group allocation rapidly captures attention and enhances processing.
  • Shared cognitive mechanisms likely underlie self-biases and ingroup-biases.
  • Social biases significantly filter perception, even with arbitrary group assignments.