Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
Published on: October 1, 2011
Unidirectional response to bidirectional selection on body size II. Quantitative genetics.
Arnaud Le Rouzic1, Clémentine Renneville2, Alexis Millot3
1Laboratoire Évolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie CNRS, IRD, Université Paris-Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette France.
Quantitative genetics models struggle to predict evolutionary responses. Artificial selection experiments in medaka fish revealed mismatches between predicted and observed changes in body size and maturity.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Quantitative genetics
- Animal breeding
Background:
- Accurate estimation of trait evolvabilities is crucial for predicting evolutionary changes under selection.
- Multivariate quantitative genetics models are used to predict trait evolution, but their precision for fitness-related traits is empirically uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the predictive accuracy of quantitative genetics models for bivariate artificial selection on body size and maturity in medaka fish.
- To investigate the extent to which observed evolutionary responses align with theoretical predictions.
Main Methods:
- Bivariate artificial selection was applied to body size and maturity in three lines of medaka fish (Large, Small, Control).
- A random effect ('animal') model was used to remove nonheritable trends and noise.
- Observed selection responses were compared to theoretical predictions.
Main Results:
- The Small line did not evolve smaller body length; its response was smaller than predicted.
- The Large and Control lines showed expected responses for body size.
- The response for maturity was opposite to predictions in both selected lines, with the Large line evolving late maturity and the Small line evolving early maturity.
Conclusions:
- Observed evolutionary responses in medaka fish substantially mismatched theoretical predictions from quantitative genetics models.
- The discrepancies could not be explained by common sources of uncertainty like sampling effects or genetic drift.
- This highlights limitations in the predictive power of current models for complex trait evolution.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Frequency-dependent Selection
Genetics of Speciation
Inclusive Fitness
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle

