Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Effect of Left and Right Coronary Flow Waveforms on Aortic Sinus Hemodynamics and Leaflet Shear Stress: Correlation
Dorma C Flemister1, Hoda Hatoum2,3, Varshini Guhan4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Insights
Coronary flow significantly impacts aortic valve hemodynamics and calcification. The left coronary cusp flow leads to lower vorticity and higher calcification risk compared to right and non-coronary cusps.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary flow influences hemodynamics in the aortic sinus.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for aortic valve disease research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare hemodynamics and wall shear stress (WSS) from left, right, and non-coronary cusp flows.
- To correlate WSS with leaflet calcification in patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a left heart simulator with physiological coronary flow waveforms.
- Employed particle image velocimetry for flow quantification.
- Analyzed CT data from 31 patients with calcific aortic valve disease.
Main Results:
- Right coronary cusp (RCC) showed wider leaflet opening than LCC and NCC.
- Left coronary cusp (LCC) flow exhibited diminished sinus vorticity.
- Higher WSS occurrences in LCC and RCC compared to NCC; LCC showed higher calcification likelihood.
Conclusions:
- Coronary flow patterns significantly affect aortic leaflet kinematics and sinus hemodynamics.
- Left coronary cusp flow is associated with a greater propensity for aortic valve calcification.
Abstract:
Coronary flow induces hemodynamic alterations in the aortic sinus region. The objectives of this study are to: (1) investigate the differences among sinus hemodynamics and leaflet wall shear stresses engendered by the left versus right versus non-coronary flow and (2) correlate respective wall shear stresses with leaflet calcification in patients. A left heart simulator flow loop with a tunable coronary circuit provided physiological coronary flow waveforms corresponding to the left coronary cusp case (LCC), right coronary cusp case (RCC), and non-coronary cusp case (NCC). High spatio-temporal resolution particle image velocimetry was conducted to quantify leaflet wall shear stress and sinus vorticity fields and to measure aortic leaflet tip kinematics. Thirty-one patients with severe calcific aortic valve disease were segmented from CT data for the calcific volumes in their respective left, right, and non-coronary cusps. Leaflet tip position during systole shows the RCC has a wider leaflet opening compared to LCC and NCC. Velocity and vorticity fields combined with leaflet position data show that sinus vorticity is diminished (peak ~ 43 s-1) in the LCC while RCC and NCC maintain high vorticity (~ 1200 and ~ 950 s-1 respectively). WSS magnitudes greater than 0.3 Pa show 20 and 81% greater occurrences in the LCC and RCC respectively compared to NCC. Significant differences [X2 (2, n = 31) = 7.31, p = 0.0258] between the calcification levels in each cusp of the patient population. Coronary flow differences between LCC, RCC, and NCC show significant impact on leaflet kinematics and sinus flow hemodynamics. Clinical data correlations of the coronary flow cases indicate the left coronary cusp has a higher likelihood of calcification compared to the right.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

