Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:28

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Craniofacial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Cross River Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla diehli).

American journal of biological anthropology·2026
Same author

A systematic review and meta-analysis of pedagogical trends and impact in neuroanatomy education.

Anatomical sciences education·2026
Same author

A multimodal curriculum with integrated gamification helps reduce neurophobia in medical students.

Anatomical sciences education·2026
Same author

Simulated anatomy ward rounds: Bridging preclinical and clinical assessment.

Medical education·2025
Same author

Taxonomic and sex differences in sagittal cresting among gracile and robust capuchin monkeys.

Journal of anatomy·2025
Same author

Comparative Context of Hard-Tissue Sexual Dimorphism in Early Hominins: Implications for Alpha Taxonomy.

Evolutionary anthropology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.7K

How does scanner choice and 3D model resolution affect data accuracy?

Katharine L Balolia1, Jason S Massey2,3

  • 1School of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Journal of Anatomy
|November 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated 3D scanning methods for primate specimens, finding accuracy depends on object size and model resolution. Recommendations are provided for optimal scanning resolutions to ensure accurate data collection when combining digital models with caliper measurements.

Keywords:
AccuracyCT scanninglaser scanningresolutionvirtual measurementswhite light scanning

More Related Videos

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.9K
Voxel Printing Anatomy: Design and Fabrication of Realistic, Presurgical Planning Models through Bitmap Printing
11:36

Voxel Printing Anatomy: Design and Fabrication of Realistic, Presurgical Planning Models through Bitmap Printing

Published on: February 9, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.7K
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.9K
Voxel Printing Anatomy: Design and Fabrication of Realistic, Presurgical Planning Models through Bitmap Printing
11:36

Voxel Printing Anatomy: Design and Fabrication of Realistic, Presurgical Planning Models through Bitmap Printing

Published on: February 9, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Digital morphology
  • 3D scanning technologies
  • Primate anatomy

Background:

  • Digital methods are increasingly used to collect data from 3D models.
  • Previous research has not systematically evaluated error sources in 3D scanning for accurate data acquisition.
  • Understanding the impact of scanning method and model resolution on data accuracy is crucial for reliable digital morphology studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate sources of error in 3D scanning methods.
  • To provide practical recommendations for model resolution based on specimen size.
  • To assess the accuracy of measurements from 3D models compared to traditional caliper measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Tested five different 3D scanners (Breuckmann SmartSCAN, DAVID/HP 3D Pro S3, NextEngine 2020i, Creaform Go!Scan 20, microCT/clinicalCT) using primate specimens.
  • Collected data from 3D models at varying resolutions.
  • Compared measurements from 3D models with caliper measurements.
  • Assessed scan resolution accuracy across different software packages.

Main Results:

  • All tested scanners produced 3D models yielding accurate measurements for each specimen size category.
  • Measurement accuracy from 3D models is dependent on both object size and model resolution.
  • Combining caliper data with 3D model data can present challenges.
  • Discrepancies in estimated final model resolution were observed across different software packages.

Conclusions:

  • Recommended scanning resolutions: <0.3 mm for small, 0.3-0.7 mm for medium, and 0.3-0.5 mm for large specimens when integrating with caliper data.
  • Researchers should independently verify final model resolution using non-proprietary software.
  • Variability exists in the consistency of measurements between 3D surface models and calipers.