Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intermolecular Forces in Solutions02:28

Intermolecular Forces in Solutions

37.5K
The formation of a solution is an example of a spontaneous process, a process that occurs under specified conditions without energy from some external source.
When the strengths of the intermolecular forces of attraction between solute and solvent species in a solution are no different than those present in the separated components, the solution is formed with no accompanying energy change. Such a solution is called an ideal solution. A mixture of ideal gases (or gases such as helium and argon,...
37.5K
Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension01:13

Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension

6.0K
Force can be calculated from the expression for potential energy, which is a function of position. The component of a conservative force, in a particular direction, equals the negative of the derivative of the corresponding potential energy with respect to the displacement in that direction. For regions where potential energy changes rapidly with displacement, the work done and force is maximum. Also, when force is applied along the positive coordinate axis, the potential energy decreases with...
6.0K
Chemical and Solubility Equilibria02:21

Chemical and Solubility Equilibria

4.7K
The free energy change associated with dissolving a solute in a liter of solvent is called the free energy of a solution, ΔGsolution. The overall ΔGsolution is expressed as the balance of ΔGinteraction against the always-favorable free-energy of mixing, ΔGmixing. Solution formation is favorable if  ΔGsolution is less than zero, whereas it is unfavorable if ΔGsolution is greater than zero. In short, for a solution to form and complete dissolution to take place,...
4.7K
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

24.2K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
24.2K
Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility02:34

Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility

49.2K
Intermolecular forces are attractive forces that exist between molecules. They dictate several bulk properties, such as melting points, boiling points, and solubilities (miscibilities) of substances. Molar mass, molecular shape, and polarity affect the strength of different intermolecular forces, which influence the magnitude of physical properties across a family of molecules.
Temporary attractive forces like dispersion are present in all molecules, whether they are polar or nonpolar. They...
49.2K
Intermolecular Forces03:13

Intermolecular Forces

67.1K
Atoms and molecules interact through bonds (or forces): intramolecular and intermolecular. The forces are electrostatic as they arise from interactions (attractive or repulsive) between charged species (permanent, partial, or temporary charges) and exist with varying strengths between ions, polar, nonpolar, and neutral molecules. The different types of intermolecular forces are ion–dipole, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion; among these, dipole–dipole, hydrogen...
67.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smoother Alchemical Transformations via Enveloping Distribution Sampling for Free-Energy Estimation.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A Force Field Model for Actinyl Cations AnO<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> and AnO<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> (An = U, Np, Pu) Comparable with the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field.

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Solvation Free Energies of Ion Dissociations in Dichloromethane: En Route to Accurate Computations.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025
Same author

Exploring the Influence of Ionic Liquid Anion Structure on Gas-Ionic Liquid Partition Coefficients of Organic Solutes Using Machine Learning.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2024
Same author

Multistate Method to Efficiently Account for Tautomerism and Protonation in Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2024
Same author

Simulation of aqueous solutes using the adaptive solvent-scaling (AdSoS) scheme.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches
07:31

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches

Published on: September 1, 2023

2.9K

Evaluating Classical Force Fields against Experimental Cross-Solvation Free Energies.

Sadra Kashefolgheta1, Marina P Oliveira1, Salomé R Rieder1

  • 1Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH Zürich, ETH-Hönggerberg, HCI, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|November 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study systematically evaluates four molecular force fields using a comprehensive matrix of experimental solvation free energies. All force fields performed similarly, with minor differences in accuracy for predicting solvation properties.

More Related Videos

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

13.1K
Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches
07:31

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches

Published on: September 1, 2023

2.9K
Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

13.1K
Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Molecular Modeling
  • Physical Chemistry

Background:

  • Experimental solvation free energies are crucial for validating condensed-phase force fields.
  • Current validation methods are often unsystematic, using limited solutes and solvents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically assess the accuracy of popular molecular force fields.
  • To introduce and utilize a comprehensive cross-solvation free energy matrix for force field evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a matrix of 625 cross-solvation free energies (ΔG_A:B⊖) for 25 diverse molecules.
  • Evaluated four force fields: GROMOS-2016H66, OPLS-AA, AMBER-GAFF, and CHARMM-CGenFF.
  • Compared force field predictions against curated experimental data.

Main Results:

  • All four force fields demonstrated comparable performance in predicting solvation free energies.
  • Root-mean-square errors ranged from 2.9 to 4.0 kJ·mol⁻¹.
  • Average errors were between -0.8 and +1.0 kJ·mol⁻¹, with AMBER and CHARMM showing the lowest magnitudes.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated force fields exhibit similar accuracy for the tested molecular systems.
  • Differences in performance are statistically significant but not substantial.
  • Potential inaccuracies in experimental data may influence outlier results.