Assessment of the structural complexity of diffusion MRI voxels using 3D electron microscopy in the rat brain

Raimo A Salo1, Ilya Belevich2, Eija Jokitalo2

  • 1A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.

Neuroimage
|November 4, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM) and 3D structure tensor analysis provide detailed insights into brain microstructure. This helps validate diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) by revealing diffusion barriers and orientation distributions.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Microscopy

Background:

  • Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) interpretation relies on understanding water diffusion barriers within brain tissue microstructure.
  • Current dMRI validation methods lack detailed microstructural information, particularly in complex grey matter regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To utilize serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM) and 3D structure tensor (3D-ST) analysis to characterize brain microstructure.
  • To compare microstructural orientation distributions derived from SBEM/3D-ST with parameters from dMRI techniques (NODDI, CSD).
  • To advance the interpretation and validation of dMRI signals in brain tissue.

Main Methods:

  • Imaging of rat brain white and grey matter using serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM).
  • 3D structure tensor (3D-ST) analysis of SBEM volumes to determine orientation distributions.
  • Parameterization of orientation distributions using Watson, angular central Gaussian (ACG), and spherical harmonic (SH) models.
  • Comparison of 3D-ST derived parameters with neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) parameters.

Main Results:

  • SBEM provided high-contrast visualization of cellular membranes, crucial diffusion barriers.
  • ACG and SH models better captured orientation distributions, especially asymmetric ones, compared to Watson.
  • dMRI parameters showed good correspondence with 3D-ST parameters in white matter, but less so in grey matter.
  • SBEM and 3D-ST analysis revealed non-axially symmetric orientation distributions, well-described by ACG.

Conclusions:

  • SBEM combined with 3D-ST analysis offers detailed microstructural insights for dMRI validation.
  • The ability to model asymmetric dispersion improves the characterization of complex neural architecture.
  • This approach represents a significant step towards accurate interpretation of dMRI signals in diverse brain tissues.