Harmonizing Heterogeneous Endpoints in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Trials Without Loss of Information

Maja von Cube1,2, Marlon Grodd1,2, Martin Wolkewitz1,2

  • 1Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Critical Care Medicine
|November 5, 2020
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study offers statistical guidelines for harmonizing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) trial endpoints. A multistate model and stacked probability plot help analyze treatment effects for better decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Numerous clinical trials are investigating treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
  • Effective decision-making by clinicians, public health authorities, and regulatory agencies requires comprehensive information from these trials.
  • Harmonizing heterogeneous endpoints across COVID-19 trials is crucial for synthesizing evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide statistical guidelines for harmonizing diverse endpoints in COVID-19 clinical trials.
  • To introduce a multistate model for analyzing patient outcomes.
  • To recommend methods for illustrating time-dynamic treatment effects.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a multistate model incorporating hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, death, and discharge.
  • Review of registered COVID-19 clinical trials to support model state selection.
  • Application of a stacked probability plot for visualizing treatment effects on patient hospital course.

Main Results:

  • The multistate model effectively integrates key patient outcomes (hospitalization, ventilation, death, discharge).
  • Stacked probability plots offer detailed insights into treatment effects on patient trajectories.
  • The proposed methods facilitate the harmonization of multiple endpoints and varying follow-up durations.

Conclusions:

  • Ongoing COVID-19 trials should incorporate stacked probability plots for descriptive analysis.
  • The multistate model provides valuable descriptive information, linking results within and between trials.
  • This approach aids in understanding treatment effects and harmonizing data for robust evidence synthesis.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.3K
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

Body:In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
97
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.0K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
66
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
75
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

Body:The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
91