Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

247
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
247
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

83
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
83
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

421
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
421
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

433
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
433
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

283
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
283
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contributions of preeclampsia to preterm delivery: a hypothetical interventional cohort study using incremental propensity scores.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Analyzing multiple mediators in multiple single-mediator models leads to wrong conclusions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Investigating lived ostracism: valid causal inference requires articulating the causal estimand.

The Journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

Causal Machine Learning Methods and Use of Cross-Fitting in Settings With High-Dimensional Confounding.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Doubly Robust Control Outcome Calibration Approach Estimation of Conditional Effects with Uncontrolled Confounding.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Confounder selection strategies targeting stable treatment effect estimators.

Wen Wei Loh1, Stijn Vansteelandt2,3

  • 1Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Statistics in Medicine
|November 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Selecting confounders in observational studies is crucial for accurate causal effect estimation. This study proposes a new method prioritizing stable treatment effect estimation by selecting a minimal set of covariates for adjustment.

Keywords:
covariate selectiondouble selectionfull matchingobservational studiesrandomization inference

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

947
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

947
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Observational studies require adjusting for baseline confounders to infer causal treatment effects.
  • Adjusting for all covariates can lead to inefficient, unstable, and biased estimators.
  • Covariate selection is used to identify a sufficient subset for confounding adjustment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel confounder selection strategy for stable treatment effect estimation in observational studies.
  • To identify a minimal set of covariates that ensures valid causal inference.
  • To improve the efficiency and stability of treatment effect estimators.

Main Methods:

  • Prioritizing covariates for inclusion in the propensity score (PS) model.
  • Utilizing a change-in-estimate approach to select the smallest adjustment set.
  • Assessing the strategy's performance via simulation studies and real-world datasets.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrates the ability to correctly select confounders.
  • It ensures valid causal inference following data-driven covariate selection.
  • Empirical assessments show comparable or improved performance against existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed confounder selection strategy effectively balances bias-variance trade-offs.
  • It provides a robust approach for causal effect estimation in observational data.
  • This method enhances the reliability of treatment effect inference from observational studies.