Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stoma avoidance in rectal cancer.

P J Finan1

  • 1General Infirmary, Leeds.

British Journal of Hospital Medicine
|October 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Restorative resections for rectal cancer aim to avoid stomas, but controlled trials comparing them to abdominoperineal excision are lacking. Uncontrolled studies suggest similar disease control rates.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Time to Surgery Following Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer and its Impact on Postoperative Outcomes. A Population-Based Study Across the English National Health Service, 2009-2014.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2019
Same author

Hot Tubbing with the Coroner, 2018.

The Medico-legal journal·2019
Same author

Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2016
Same author

The Effect of the UK Coordinating Centre for Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT1) on Population-based Treatment and Survival for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Anus.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2015
Same author

Model for risk adjustment of postoperative mortality in patients with colorectal cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2014
Same author

Successful removal of a massive retrorectal cystic hamartoma (tailgut cyst) using a combined paracoccygeal and myocutaneous gluteal flap approach.

Techniques in coloproctology·2014
Same journal

The autopsy in the 1990s.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Screening for breast cancer.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Cost-effective monotherapy of concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Liposarcoma: a review of current diagnosis and management.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

How to do it in surgery: laparoscopic rectopexy.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

The management of ovarian cancer.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Advances in surgical techniques have increased interest in restorative resections for rectal cancer.
  • Restorative resections aim to preserve bowel continuity and avoid the need for a stoma.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of restorative resections compared to traditional abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
  • To address the lack of controlled trials in the surgical literature regarding these techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing surgical literature and uncontrolled studies.
  • Comparison of outcomes between restorative resection techniques and abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anus.

Main Results:

  • The majority of patients undergoing restorative resections may avoid a permanent or temporary stoma.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adequately controlled trials comparing restorative techniques with abdominoperineal excision are currently lacking.
  • Uncontrolled studies indicate comparable local disease control rates between the two approaches.

    • Conclusions:

    • Restorative resections offer a promising alternative for rectal cancer patients, potentially avoiding stomas.
    • Further high-quality, controlled trials are needed to definitively compare restorative resections with abdominoperineal excision.
    • Current evidence from uncontrolled studies suggests comparable oncological outcomes, particularly local control.