Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

6.0K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
6.0K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.1K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.1K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.7K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.7K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

321
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
321
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

94.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.2K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.4K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selection Bias in Psychedelic Research: Comparing Self-Reported Quality-Of-Life Impact Between Enthusiasts and a General Population Sample.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2026
Same author

Perceptual discrepancies in the experience and reporting of violence against children are more pronounced among social workers compared to laypeople.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Generative AI-assisted clinical interviewing of mental health.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Use of 4 Open-Ended Text Responses to Help Identify People at Risk of Gaming Disorder: Preregistered Development and Usability Study Using Natural Language Processing.

JMIR serious games·2024
Same author

Question-based computational language approach outperforms rating scales in quantifying emotional states.

Communications psychology·2024
Same author

Gender discrimination in Swedish family courts: A quantitative vignette study.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Epidemiological characteristics of amebiasis in Japan from 2001 to 2022.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal associations of academic stress with eating related patterns, nutrition, somatic indicators, and depressive symptoms in university students: A study protocol.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Pollution removal efficiency enhancement by agricultural biomass additions in constructed wetlands: A framework integrating meta-analysis with explainable machine learning.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Insulation failure mapping on power transformer bushing using FRA and electrostatic simulation.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Enhancing medical Q&A systems with multimodal knowledge graphs and dual-layer attention mechanisms.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

UAMP: Consistent video object segmentation with uncertainty-aware memory propagation.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats
05:57

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats

Published on: June 27, 2014

13.5K

Weighting power by preference eliminates gender differences.

Sverker Sikström1, Laura Mai Stoinski2, Kristina Karlsson3

  • 1Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Plos One
|November 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Men and women perceive power differently across life domains. Preference-weighted power (PWP) reveals women hold more private power, while men hold more public power, with no overall gender difference when preferences are considered.

More Related Videos

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.2K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats
05:57

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats

Published on: June 27, 2014

13.5K
A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.2K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Gender Studies

Background:

  • Societal notions often associate power with public life, leading to the perception that men possess more power than women.
  • This perspective may overlook the subjective importance individuals place on power across various life domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate the concept of preference-weighted power (PWP), a measure accounting for domain-specific power and its subjective importance.
  • To investigate gender differences in perceived power across different life domains using the PWP framework.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1: Developed a semantic measure of the power construct using latent semantic analysis on participant-generated power-related words.
  • Study 2: Calculated a PWP index by weighting self-rated power in different domains by their subjective importance.

Main Results:

  • Men reported higher power in the public domain, while women reported higher power in the private domain.
  • The private domain, where women held more power, was weighted more heavily in importance than the public domain.
  • No significant gender differences in overall PWP were found when domain preferences were factored in.

Conclusions:

  • Perceived power is domain-specific and influenced by subjective importance, challenging traditional gender power dynamics.
  • The PWP framework offers a more nuanced understanding of gender and power, highlighting differences in specific life areas rather than overall power.
  • Findings suggest a re-evaluation of societal perceptions of men's and women's power is warranted.