Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
3.6K
Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: Initial Experience with Simultaneous Bilateral Flaps for Breast Reconstruction
Nicholas T Haddock1, Sumeet S Teotia1
1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|November 6, 2020
Summary
Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction using lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flaps is feasible. This approach offers an alternative for patients unsuitable for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, with careful planning needed.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Microsurgery
Background:
- The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap is an alternative for breast reconstruction when the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is not feasible.
- Bilateral breast reconstruction with LAP flaps is often staged due to positioning and ischemia time concerns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction using LAP flaps.
- To present early experiences with this innovative technique.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients undergoing breast reconstruction with LAP flaps (December 2018 - September 2019).
- Data collected included demographics, flap details, and complications.
- Surgical sequence for simultaneous bilateral reconstruction was analyzed.
Main Results:
- Thirty simultaneous bilateral breast reconstructions were performed using LAP flaps.
- One flap loss occurred in a patient with undiagnosed hypercoagulability.
- Average operative time was 510 minutes, with an average ischemia time of 90.3 minutes.
- All flaps utilized a composite deep inferior epigastric arterial/venous graft.
Conclusions:
- Simultaneous bilateral LAP flap breast reconstruction can be safely performed in a single stage.
- This technique is technically challenging and requires a coordinated team approach.
- Prolonged ischemia time and potential for vasospasm necessitate caution and possible intraoperative revisions.

