Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
The Effectiveness of Working Memory Training for Children With Low Working Memory
Megan Spencer-Smith1,2, Jon Quach3,4, Fiona Mensah3,5
1Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; megan.spencer-smith@monash.edu.
Working memory training (Cogmed) showed limited benefits for most children, with those exhibiting hyperactivity or inattention being less likely to improve. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions for specific child subgroups.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Working memory training aims to enhance cognitive abilities in children.
- Individual differences in response to cognitive interventions are common.
- The Cogmed Working Memory Training program is a widely studied intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if children with specific characteristics respond differently to the Cogmed Working Memory Training program.
- To examine the efficacy of Cogmed in subgroups including those with low IQ, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, emotional/behavioral issues, or special health care needs.
Main Methods:
- A population-based randomized controlled trial (Memory Maestros) involving 452 first-grade children with low working memory.
- Comparison of Cogmed intervention (20-25 sessions) against usual teaching.
- Assessment of working memory changes using the Automated Working Memory Assessment over 6 months.
Main Results:
- Approximately one-third of children showed significant working memory improvement post-Cogmed, with similar outcomes in the control group.
- Children with elevated hyperactivity/inattention were less likely to improve visuospatial working memory with Cogmed.
- No differential effects were observed for children with low IQ, emotional/behavioral symptoms, special health care needs, or by sex.
Conclusions:
- Cogmed did not demonstrate significant differential benefits across most studied subgroups.
- Children with hyperactivity/inattention showed poorer outcomes with Cogmed, suggesting limited efficacy for this group.
- More research is required to tailor working memory interventions to specific child populations.
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Information Processing Approach
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

