Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Modification and Application of a Leaf Blower-vac for Field Sampling of Arthropods
Published on: August 10, 2016
Conservation biological control research is strongly uneven across trophic levels and economic measures
Anne C Johnson1, Jian Liu1, Olivia Reynolds1,2,3,4
1Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Charles Sturt University and New South Wales Department of Primary Industries), Orange, NSW, Australia.
Abstract:
Conservation biological control suppresses pests by promoting established rather than inoculative or mass released natural enemies. Research in this approach has expanded rapidly this century but uptake remains limited. Why? Most of the 150 peer reviewed papers reporting field experiments include results on natural enemies and/or pests. Only a minority report effects on crop damage levels or yield, and very few consider economic consequences. This is despite evidence for potential benefits across this full spectrum of response variables. We argue that the limited scope of work to date constrains the development of a compelling evidence base to demonstrate the field effectiveness of conservation biological control, hampering its uptake so encourage researchers to include the assessment of economic impact in future studies of conservation biological control. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Related Concept Videos
Trophic Efficiency
What is Conservation Biology?
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
Trophic Levels
Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of Small Populations

