Side-effects and technical problems in cytapheresis with cell separators. Results of a retrospective multicenter...

On the basis of a survey, the acute side-effects and technical problems in a total of 77,525 cytaphereses (IFC 36,530, CFC 40,995) in donors at 39 hemapheresis centers were retrospectively analysed statistically. In general, relevant donor side-effects (0.78%-1.05%) were more rare than the primary donor-independent disturbances (1.65%-2.63%). The donor side-effects predominated merely with the use of the cell separators Haemonetics M30/Belco (1.06% vs. 0.57%). These were mainly circulatory reactions (0.83%), which were generally much more frequent with IFC (0.54%) than with CFC (IBM/Cobe 0.11%, CS-3000 0.19%). Potentially fatal complications were not reported. The frequency of side-effects, disturbances and discontinuations correlated inversely with the separation rate of the individual centers per method. Centers in which two or three methods were applied simultaneously reported a higher frequency of side-effects and disturbances. Hemolysis was only observed with IFC (0.09%), but not with the use of the Haemonetics V50. The greater susceptibility to disturbances of technical/methodological/operational origin essentially results from the more elaborate, but not yet perfected technology, including computer control and monitoring, as well as defects in the production of the much more complicated disposable sets. Thus the highest rate of discontinuations was calculated for the system which is so far the most sophisticated technically (CS-3000, 1.85%). Although the primary donor-independent problems sometimes correlate directly with the manifestation of donor side-effects, the greater technological sophistication of automatically controlled and monitored systems cannot be dispensed with, since only in this way can potentially fatal risks for the donors be largely ruled out.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)