Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Production and Visualization of Bacterial Spheroplasts and Protoplasts to Characterize Antimicrobial Peptide Localization
Published on: August 11, 2018
Interaction of the surface bound antimicrobial peptides melimine and Mel4 with Staphylococcus aureus
Muhammad Yasir1, Debarun Dutta1,2, Naresh Kumar3
1School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract:
Melimine and Mel4 are cationic antimicrobial peptides which can resist biofilm development once bound to biomaterials. The aim of the current study was to determine the mode of action of bound melimine and Mel4 against S. aureus. The peptides were covalently attached to glass using an azidobenzoic acid linker. The amount of attached peptides was confirmed by XPS and amino acid analysis and their covalent attachment by SDS extraction. The release of autolysins after interaction of S. aureus with immobilized peptides was determined in cell free supernatants. The interaction of immobilized peptides with lipoteichoic acid was confirmed by ELISA. Membrane damage by surface bound peptides was assessed using DiSC(3)-5 (membrane potential sensitive), Syto-9 (membrane permeable) and PI (membrane impermeable) dyes with fluorescence microscopy. Release of ATP and nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) was measured in the surrounding fluid. Attachment of the peptides resulted in increased N% for melimine (5.4 ± 1.8%) and for Mel4 (4.8 ± 1.8%). The concentrations of immobilised amino acids were 0.297 nmole for melimine and 0.358 nmole for Mel4. SDS extraction released < 15% of peptides from the glass. The immobilized peptides bound ≥ 4 times more LTA than control surfaces. More autolysins (8 ± 2%; p = 0.026) were released from Mel4 than melimine or control surfaces. Membrane depolarization occurred at 15 min and was associated with a reduction in bacterial viability ≥ 37% for both peptides (p < 0.001). Disruption of the membrane potential resulted in loss of ATP from melimine (0.9 ± 0.4 nM) or Mel4 (0.6 ± 0.3 nM) coated surfaces compared to control (p < 0.001). Melimine coatings yielded 27 ± 11% (p = 0.026) and Mel4 gave 17 ± 12% (p = 0.150) PI stained cells after 4 h. DNA/RNA was released only by melimine coatings (2.1 ± 0.1 times; p = 0.011) compared to process control at 6 h. Both bound peptides resulted in the release of ATP, but only melimine released DNA/RNA while Mel4-coating resulted in the release of autolysins. Since the mode of action of melimine and Mel4 relate to the cell surface, they have potential for the development of infection-resistant implants.
Insights
Cationic antimicrobial peptides melimine and Mel4, when bound to biomaterials, disrupt Staphylococcus aureus cell membranes, leading to ATP release. Melimine also releases DNA/RNA, while Mel4 releases autolysins, indicating potential for infection-resistant implants.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Antimicrobial Peptides
- Microbiology
Background:
- Cationic antimicrobial peptides (melimine and Mel4) can prevent biofilm formation on biomaterials.
- Understanding their mechanism of action against bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus is crucial for developing effective antimicrobial surfaces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the mode of action of covalently bound melimine and Mel4 against S. aureus.
- To assess the potential of these peptides for creating infection-resistant biomaterials.
Main Methods:
- Covalent attachment of melimine and Mel4 to glass surfaces via an azidobenzoic acid linker.
- Confirmation of peptide attachment using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and amino acid analysis.
- Assessment of bacterial membrane damage using fluorescent dyes (DiSC(3)-5, Syto-9, PI) and microscopy.
- Quantification of released intracellular components (ATP, DNA/RNA) and bacterial autolysins.
Main Results:
- Immobilized peptides demonstrated increased binding to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) compared to control surfaces.
- Both melimine and Mel4 induced membrane depolarization and reduced bacterial viability.
- Bound peptides caused ATP release; melimine additionally led to DNA/RNA release, while Mel4 promoted autolysin release.
Conclusions:
- Bound melimine and Mel4 effectively damage the S. aureus cell surface, leading to cell death.
- The distinct mechanisms (autolysin release by Mel4, DNA/RNA release by melimine) offer different therapeutic potentials.
- These peptides show promise for developing biomaterials that resist bacterial colonization and infection.
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Proteins
Interferons
Interferons (IFNs) are proteins produced by lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infected with viruses. While IFNs cannot prevent viruses from entering and...
Surface Membrane Barriers
The outer layer of the skin, the epidermis, is a robust barrier comprising layers of closely packed keratinized cells. This dense arrangement prevents microbes from penetrating the body. The periodic shedding of epidermal cells...
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...

