Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of Electroencephalographic Neurofeedback for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Prevalence and clinical outcome of contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone in Southern-East Norway: A retrospective case-study.

Contact dermatitis·2023
Same author

Mind and body: Psychophysiological profiles of instructional and motivational self-talk.

Psychophysiology·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 1, 2025

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.3K

Electroencephalographic neurofeedback training can decrease conscious motor control and increase single and dual-task

Amanpreet Sidhu1,2, Andrew Cooke3

  • 1School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, George Building, Gwynedd, Bangor, LL57 2PZ, UK.

Experimental Brain Research
|November 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Electroencephalographic neurofeedback training, specifically decreasing alpha-power, improved motor control and cognitive performance in a dual-task scenario. This method may help reduce negative impacts of conscious motor control.

Keywords:
AutomaticityBrain-trainingHuman movementMotor controlReinvestmentTimed-up-and-go

More Related Videos

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

13.5K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 1, 2025

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.3K
Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

13.5K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Human movement typically automates with repetition, reducing errors and dual-task costs.
  • Conscious motor control, often triggered by illness or constraints, can impair movement proficiency and dual-task performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback training can mitigate the adverse effects of conscious motor control on movement.
  • To investigate the impact of specific EEG neurofeedback protocols on single and dual-task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-five participants performed the Timed-Up-and-Go task under single and dual-task conditions with a leg brace to de-automate movement.
  • Participants underwent 30-minute EEG neurofeedback training sessions, with three conditions: decreasing central EEG alpha-power, increasing it, or sham training.
  • Performance was assessed pre- and post-training, with mediation analyses examining cognitive performance's role.

Main Results:

  • Training to decrease central EEG alpha-power significantly improved performance in both single-task and dual-task conditions.
  • No performance benefits were observed with opposite (increase alpha-power) or sham neurofeedback.
  • Improvement in dual-task motor performance was mediated by enhanced cognitive performance, suggesting reduced conscious motor control.

Conclusions:

  • EEG neurofeedback targeting decreased central alpha-power can effectively reduce the negative consequences of conscious motor control on movement.
  • This neurofeedback protocol shows promise for rehabilitation and high-performance domains by alleviating issues associated with conscious motor exertion.