Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Pediatric Vaccines and Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: How Much is Too Much to Pay for Prevention?
Jordan Amdahl1, Derek Weycker2, Ray Farkouh3
1Policy Analysis Inc., Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Insights
Cost-effectiveness evaluations for pediatric vaccines lack clear thresholds, potentially overlooking societal values like risk aversion. This impacts public health policy and healthcare budgets.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Public health policy
- Vaccine decision-making
Background:
- Cost-effectiveness evaluations are crucial for the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) pediatric vaccine recommendations.
- Existing evaluations for pediatric vaccines show highly variable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
- There is no explicit ACIP threshold for determining acceptable costs for preventing childhood communicable diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and discuss the limitations of conventional cost-effectiveness thresholds, specifically the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) metric.
- To highlight the inadequacy of QALYs in capturing societal preferences regarding risk and health benefit distribution.
- To question the applicability of a uniform 'yardstick' for valuing disease prevention in children versus older adults.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and critical discussion of existing cost-effectiveness methodologies.
- Analysis of the implications of current metrics on public health policy.
- Examination of the theoretical and practical considerations in valuing health outcomes.
Main Results:
- Conventional ICER thresholds based on QALYs may not adequately reflect societal values, such as risk aversion.
- QALY models do not account for the distribution of health benefits across different population segments.
- The assumption that 'a QALY is a QALY' may be inappropriate when considering diverse age groups and societal preferences.
Conclusions:
- Current cost-effectiveness evaluation methods for pediatric vaccines may be insufficient.
- Revisiting these methods is essential for equitable and effective public health policy.
- The findings have significant implications for healthcare budgeting and population well-being.
Abstract:
Cost-effectiveness evaluations play an important role in recommendations for use of pediatric vaccines that are set forth by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The fact that these evaluations are undertaken and accorded weight suggests that a critical value for designating pediatric vaccines as cost-effective (or not) must exist. For recommended pediatric vaccines, however, reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) have varied greatly, and there does not appear to be an explicit threshold used by the ACIP to define how much is too much to pay for the prevention of communicable diseases in children. Further complicating this issue is the fact that conventional ICER thresholds-expressed in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained-accord value only to length and quality of life and may not reflect our preferences as individuals or a society. For example, risk, an important attribute of many healthcare decisions, is ignored by the QALY model, as is the distribution of health benefits across different members of society. Are we indeed indifferent about risk and do we really believe that the value of disease prevention in children should be measured by the same "yardstick" as that for older adults? Accordingly, do we really believe that "a QALY is a QALY"? These issues, which are reviewed and discussed in this article, are more than just of theoretical interest; the answers impact how public health policy is determined, which impacts the lives and well-being of entire populations as well as the budgets of payers.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Preventive Healthcare Services

