Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Bolsa Família program and incomplete childhood vaccination in two Brazilian cohorts
Francelena de Sousa Silva1, Rejane Christine de Sousa Queiroz2, Maria Dos Remédios Freitas Carvalho Branco3
1Secretaria Municipal de Saúde. São Luís, Maranhão, MA, Brasil.
Insights
Benefiting from the Bolsa Família Program (BFP) did not impact childhood vaccination schedules in low-income children. This suggests potential issues with monitoring the program's vaccination conditionalities.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatrics
- Social Determinants of Health
Background:
- The Bolsa Família Program (BFP) is a conditional cash transfer program in Brazil aimed at reducing poverty.
- Vaccination is a key health indicator and a condition for receiving BFP benefits.
- Understanding the program's impact on vaccination is crucial for public health policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of being a Bolsa Família Program (BFP) beneficiary on the vaccination status of children aged 13 to 35 months.
- To assess whether BFP conditionalities related to vaccination are effectively promoting immunization in low-income populations.
Main Methods:
- The study utilized data from the Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Birth Cohort Studies, focusing on low-income children born in 2010.
- Cadastro Único (Single Registry) data identified BFP beneficiaries, and vaccination status was assessed using a comprehensive vaccine schedule.
- Statistical analyses employed inverse probability of exposure weighting and propensity score matching to estimate the BFP's effect.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant effect of BFP beneficiation was found on the childhood vaccination schedule, regardless of the statistical method used (weighting or matching).
- Coefficients for BFP beneficiaries showed no significant association with complete vaccination (e.g., SL-coefficient: -0.01; 95%CI -0.07 to 0.05; p = 0.744).
Conclusions:
- Receipt of Bolsa Família Program (BFP) benefits did not influence childhood vaccination completion among eligible low-income children.
- The findings suggest that the vaccination conditionality of the BFP may not be adequately monitored or enforced, potentially undermining its public health objectives.
Objective:
To estimate the effect of being a beneficiary of the Bolsa Família Program (BFP) in the vaccination of children aged 13 to 35 months.
Methods:
Our study was based on all birth records of residents of Ribeirão Preto (SP) and probabilistic sampling with 1/3 of the births of residents of São Luís (MA), selecting low-income children, born in 2010, belonging to the cohorts Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Birth Cohort Studies and eligible for the Bolsa Família program. The information of Cadastro Único (CadÚnico - Single Registry) was used to categorize the receipt of benefit from the BFP (yes or no). The final sample consisted of 532 children in Ribeirão Preto and 1,229 in São Luís. The outcome variable was a childhood vaccine regimen, constructed with BCG, tetravalent, triple viral, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis, rotavirus and yellow fever vaccines. The adjustment variables were: economic class, mother's schooling and mother's skin color. Children with monthly per capita family income of up to R$ 280.00 and/or economic class D/E were considered eligible for the benefit of the BFP. A theoretical model was constructed using a directed acyclic graph to estimate the effect of being a beneficiary of the BFP in the vaccination of low-income children. In the statistical analyses, weighing was used by the inverse of the probability of exposure and pairing by propensity score.
Results:
Considering a monthly per capita family income of up to R$ 280.00, being a beneficiary of the BFP had no effect on the childhood vaccination schedule, according to weighing by the inverse of the probability of exposure (SL-coefficient: -0.01; 95%CI -0.07 to 0.04; p = 0.725 and RP-coefficient: 0.04; 95%CI -0.02 to 0.10; p = 0.244) and pairing by propensity score (SL-coefficient: -0.01; 95%CI -0.07 to 0.05; p = 0.744 and RP-coefficient: 0.04; 95%CI -0.02 to 0.10; p = 0.231).
Conclusions:
The receipt of the benefit of the BFP did not influence childhood vaccination, which is one of the conditionalities of the program. This may indicate that this conditionality is not being adequately monitored.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Causality in Epidemiology
Relative Risk

