Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.3K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

254.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
254.3K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

63.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
63.4K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

85.1K
Scientific Laws
85.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

970
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
970
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

814
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
814

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explantation of durable ventricular assist device for myocardial functional recovery in children: A report from the ACTION registry.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026
Same author

Meeting report: Expanding access to advanced cardiac therapies, including ventricular assist devices (VADs) and heart transplantation in muscular dystrophy.

Neuromuscular disorders : NMD·2026
Same author

Primary target volume delineation for radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: CSTRO, CACA, CSCO, HNCIG, ESTRO, and ASTRO guidelines and contouring atlas.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

Target volume delineation of the neck for radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: CSTRO, CACA, CSCO, HNCIG, ESTRO, and ASTRO guidelines and contouring atlas.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

Externally validated digital decision support tool for time-to-osteoradionecrosis risk-stratification using right-censored multi-institutional observational cohorts.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2025
Same author

Evaluating observer reliability and diagnostic accuracy of CT-LEFAT criteria for post-treatment head and neck lymphedema: A prospective blinded comparative analysis.

Oral oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K

Assessing criteria for theories.

David Rosenthal1

  • 1Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Graduate Center, City University of New York.

Cognitive Neuroscience
|November 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This critique addresses concerns regarding Doerig et al.

Keywords:
Consciousnesshigher-order-thought theorytheories of consciousnessunfolding argument

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Critique of existing research methodologies.
  • Examination of theoretical frameworks in cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To raise specific concerns about Doerig et al.'s research project.
  • To analyze the validity of their chosen criteria.
  • To evaluate their interpretation of higher-order-thought theory.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of published work.
  • Theoretical argumentation.
  • Comparative review of philosophical concepts.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant concerns with the overall project of Doerig et al.
  • Highlighted issues with three specific criteria used in their study.
  • Found the treatment of higher-order-thought theory to be problematic.

Conclusions:

  • The project by Doerig et al. requires further scrutiny.
  • Revisions to criteria and theoretical application are suggested.
  • The interpretation of higher-order-thought theory needs re-evaluation.