Effects of Social Housing Changes on Immunity and Vaccine-Specific Immune Responses in Adolescent Male Rhesus

Bapi Pahar1, Kate C Baker2, Alexandra N Jay2

  • 1Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, United States.

Frontiers in Immunology
|November 12, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Moving nonhuman primates from group to single housing causes more immune stress than pair housing. Pair housing offers benefits, suggesting it should be used even if animals are later moved to single housing.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Immunology
  • Animal Welfare Science
  • Primate Research

Background:

  • Nonhuman primates (NHPs) in research settings experience varied housing conditions, including group, pair, or single housing.
  • Changes in housing can impact NHP well-being and immune responses, but effects are not well-documented.
  • Understanding these impacts is crucial for ethical research and reliable scientific outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of different housing changes on immune cell activation in rhesus macaques.
  • To compare the stress levels associated with group-to-single housing versus group-to-pair housing transitions.
  • To evaluate the influence of housing configurations on vaccine-mediated immune responses.

Main Methods:

  • Eighteen male rhesus macaques were housed in different social settings (group, pair, single) with housing changes over 10-14 weeks.
  • Immune cell populations (CD8, proliferating B cells, CD20) were analyzed before and after housing changes and vaccination.
  • Vaccine responses to a commercial measles vaccine were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Moving NHPs from group to single housing (GH-SH) resulted in higher levels of proliferating B cells compared to group-to-pair housing (GH-PH).
  • GH-SH subjects showed higher CD8+ T cell frequencies post-separation than GH-PH-SH subjects.
  • Activated CD20 populations were persistently higher in GH-SH animals compared to GH-PH-SH animals.
  • Housing configuration did not affect vaccine-mediated immune responses.

Conclusions:

  • Pair housing provides benefits over single housing for research NHPs, mitigating immune perturbations.
  • Separation from group to single housing induces more severe immune function changes than separation from pair to single housing.
  • Short-duration pair housing is recommended, even when subsequent separation into single housing is necessary for research studies.