Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analyses of Cellular Immune Response in Rhesus Macaques
Published on: April 22, 2010
Effects of Social Housing Changes on Immunity and Vaccine-Specific Immune Responses in Adolescent Male Rhesus
Bapi Pahar1, Kate C Baker2, Alexandra N Jay2
1Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, United States.
Insights
Moving nonhuman primates from group to single housing causes more immune stress than pair housing. Pair housing offers benefits, suggesting it should be used even if animals are later moved to single housing.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Welfare Science
- Primate Research
Background:
- Nonhuman primates (NHPs) in research settings experience varied housing conditions, including group, pair, or single housing.
- Changes in housing can impact NHP well-being and immune responses, but effects are not well-documented.
- Understanding these impacts is crucial for ethical research and reliable scientific outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of different housing changes on immune cell activation in rhesus macaques.
- To compare the stress levels associated with group-to-single housing versus group-to-pair housing transitions.
- To evaluate the influence of housing configurations on vaccine-mediated immune responses.
Main Methods:
- Eighteen male rhesus macaques were housed in different social settings (group, pair, single) with housing changes over 10-14 weeks.
- Immune cell populations (CD8, proliferating B cells, CD20) were analyzed before and after housing changes and vaccination.
- Vaccine responses to a commercial measles vaccine were assessed.
Main Results:
- Moving NHPs from group to single housing (GH-SH) resulted in higher levels of proliferating B cells compared to group-to-pair housing (GH-PH).
- GH-SH subjects showed higher CD8+ T cell frequencies post-separation than GH-PH-SH subjects.
- Activated CD20 populations were persistently higher in GH-SH animals compared to GH-PH-SH animals.
- Housing configuration did not affect vaccine-mediated immune responses.
Conclusions:
- Pair housing provides benefits over single housing for research NHPs, mitigating immune perturbations.
- Separation from group to single housing induces more severe immune function changes than separation from pair to single housing.
- Short-duration pair housing is recommended, even when subsequent separation into single housing is necessary for research studies.
Abstract:
Nonhuman primates (NHPs) in research institutions may be housed in a variety of social settings, such as group housing, pair housing or single housing based on the needs of studies. Furthermore, housing may change over the course of studies. The effects of housing and changes in housing on cell activation and vaccine mediated immune responses are not well documented. We hypothesized that animals moved indoors from group to single housing (GH-SH) would experience more stress than those separated from groups into pair housing (GH-PH), or those placed briefly into pair housing and separated 5 weeks later into single housing (GH-PH-SH). We also compared the effects of separation from group to pair housing with the separation from pair to single housing. Eighteen male rhesus macaques were followed over the course of changes in housing condition over 10-14 weeks, as well as prior to and after primary vaccination with a commercially available measles vaccine. We identified two phenotypic biomarkers, namely total CD8 population and proliferating B cells, that differed significantly across treatment groups over time. At 10 weeks post-separation, levels of proliferating B cells were higher in GH-SH subjects compared to GH-PH subjects, and in the latter, levels were lower at 10 weeks than prior to removal from group housing. At 2 weeks post-separation from group to single housing, the frequency of CD8+ T cells was higher in GH-SH subjects compared to one week post separation from pair into single housing in the GH-PH-SH subjects. Comparing the same elapsed time since the most recent separation activated CD20 populations were persistently higher in the GH-SH animals than the GH-PH-SH animals. Housing configuration did not influence vaccine-mediated responses. Overall, our study found benefits of pair housing over single housing, suggesting that perturbations in immune function will be more severe following separation from group to single housing than from pair to single housing, and supporting the use of short-duration pair housing even when animals must subsequently be separated. These findings are useful for planning the housing configurations of research NHPs used for vaccine studies and other studies where immune response is being assessed.
More Related Videos
06:25Analysis of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-specific CD8+ T-cells in Rhesus Macaques by Peptide-MHC-I Tetramer Staining
Published on: December 23, 2016
07:21Processing of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid and Matched Blood for Alveolar Macrophage and CD4+ T-cell Immunophenotyping and HIV Reservoir Assessment
Published on: June 23, 2019