A call for a streamlined ethics review process for multijurisdictional, child health research studies
Brigitte Lemyre1,2, Jaya P Bodani3,4, Stefani Doucette5
1Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa.
Insights
Conducting multi-site neonatal research in Canada faces significant ethics review hurdles. Streamlining these processes is crucial for timely, valid, and generalizable clinical research for infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal research
- Clinical trials
- Pediatric health
Background:
- Multi-jurisdictional research is essential for robust neonatal studies.
- Current ethics review processes in Canada create substantial delays and costs.
- These challenges can impede or halt critical research projects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the experience of obtaining ethics review for a multi-site neonatal study across 7 Canadian provinces.
- To highlight the challenges encountered in multijurisdictional research ethics review.
- To advocate for practical solutions to improve research efficiency.
Main Methods:
- A single research project comparing two standard therapies for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome sought ethics approval.
- The study involved 13 sites across 7 Canadian provinces.
- The process of navigating multijurisdictional ethics review was documented.
Main Results:
- The study encountered significant hurdles in the ethics review process.
- Delays and administrative costs were incurred.
- The experience underscores the need for streamlined review procedures.
Conclusions:
- Multijurisdictional ethics review in Canada presents significant barriers to neonatal research.
- Collaborative efforts are needed to identify practical solutions.
- Improving the ethics review process will benefit researchers, ethics boards, and Canadian children and families.
Abstract:
To be time and resource efficient in neonatal research and to answer clinically relevant questions with validity and generalizability, large numbers of infants from multiple hospitals need to be included. Multijurisdictional research in Canada is currently fraught with research ethics review process hurdles that lead to delays, administrative costs, and possibly termination of projects. We describe our experience applying for ethics review to 13 sites in 7 provinces for a project comparing two standard of care therapies for preterm born infants with respiratory distress syndrome. We welcome the current opportunity created by the Institute of Human Development Child and Youth Health and the Institute for Genetics, to collaboratively identify practical solutions that would benefit Canadian researchers, Research Ethics Boards, and children and families.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers


