Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

12.5K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
12.5K
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

25.5K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
25.5K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

10.0K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
10.0K
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

13.8K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
13.8K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

563
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
563
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

605
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
605

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding patient experience during Lokomat rehabilitation in children and adolescents: a clinical observational study combining self-evaluation and physiological metrics.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Mapping the complexity of motor variability: From individual space of variability to motor fingerprints.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Motor styles in action: Developing a computational framework for operationalization of motor distances.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Neural network-based Bluetooth synchronization of multiple wearable devices.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Visuo-motor interference is modulated by task interactivity: A kinematic study.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Intersecting kinematic encoding and readout of intention in autism.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 30, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.9K

Wired actions: Anticipatory kinematic interference during a dyadic sequential motor interaction task.

Matilde Rocca1, Andrea Cavallo1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|November 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We predict and are influenced by how others move, not just what they do. This motor system permeability suggests active prediction shapes our interactions.

More Related Videos

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.2K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 30, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.9K
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.2K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Anticipating others' movements activates our motor system.
  • Action observation can cause motor interference effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate if performing a movement before another elicits motor interference.
  • Examine how movement anticipation influences own movement unfolding.

Main Methods:

  • Pairs of participants performed a sequential motor task.
  • One agent's task was constant; the other's varied.
  • Movement kinematics were analyzed for interference and similarity.

Main Results:

  • First agent's movement kinematics were influenced by anticipating the second agent's action.
  • High kinematic similarity observed within real pairs versus artificial ones.

Conclusions:

  • Dyadic motor behavior is shaped by both the 'what' and 'how' of a partner's actions.
  • Detailed, predictive representations of others' specific movements influence motor interactions.
  • The motor system's permeability to others' movements involves active prediction, not just passive reaction.