Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

77.7K
Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
77.7K
RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

6.3K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
6.3K
DNA as a Genetic Template02:05

DNA as a Genetic Template

25.3K
Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...
25.3K
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

8.0K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
8.0K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

31.8K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
31.8K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

31.0K
31.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

scGANCL: Bidirectional Generative Adversarial Network for Imputing scRNA-Seq Data With Contrastive Learning.

IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

stGNN: Spatially Informed Cell-Type Deconvolution Based on Deep Graph Learning and Statistical Modeling.

Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences·2025
Same author

A novel interpretability framework for enzyme turnover number prediction boosted by pre-trained enzyme embeddings and adaptive gate network.

Methods (San Diego, Calif.)·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Benchmarking machine learning methods for synthetic lethality prediction in cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

STCGAN: a novel cycle-consistent generative adversarial network for spatial transcriptomics cellular deconvolution.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2024
Same author

Benchmarking machine learning methods for synthetic lethality prediction in cancer.

Nature communications·2024
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.9K

Deep learning based DNA:RNA triplex forming potential prediction.

Yu Zhang1, Yahui Long2, Chee Keong Kwoh3

  • 1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.

BMC Bioinformatics
|November 13, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces TriplexFPP, a machine learning model for predicting DNA:RNA triplex formation by long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). TriplexFPP accurately identifies potential triplex-forming lncRNAs and DNA sites using experimental data.

Keywords:
DNA:RNA triplexDeep learningLong noncoding RNAs

More Related Videos

Sequence-specific and Selective Recognition of Double-stranded RNAs over Single-stranded RNAs by Chemically Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids
09:04

Sequence-specific and Selective Recognition of Double-stranded RNAs over Single-stranded RNAs by Chemically Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids

Published on: September 21, 2017

9.8K
Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

21.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.9K
Sequence-specific and Selective Recognition of Double-stranded RNAs over Single-stranded RNAs by Chemically Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids
09:04

Sequence-specific and Selective Recognition of Double-stranded RNAs over Single-stranded RNAs by Chemically Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids

Published on: September 21, 2017

9.8K
Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

21.0K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can regulate gene expression by forming DNA:RNA triplex structures.
  • Current prediction methods rely on statistical rules, leading to many false positives and lacking experimental validation.
  • Existing approaches fail to incorporate features from experimentally verified triplex-forming lncRNAs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel machine learning model for accurate prediction of DNA:RNA triplex formation.
  • To identify lncRNAs with high potential for triplex formation and predict target DNA sites.
  • To overcome limitations of current statistical methods in triplex prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed TriplexFPP, the first machine learning model for DNA:RNA triplex prediction.
  • Utilized convolutional neural networks to learn high-level features from experimentally verified data.
  • Employed fivefold cross-validation for performance assessment.

Main Results:

  • TriplexFPP achieved high accuracy in predicting triplex-forming lncRNAs (AUC=0.9649, PRC=0.9996).
  • The model also demonstrated strong performance in predicting triplex DNA sites (AUC=0.8705, PRC=0.9671).
  • Summarized cis and trans targeting mechanisms of triplex-forming lncRNAs.

Conclusions:

  • TriplexFPP effectively predicts lncRNAs capable of forming triplexes and their potential DNA targets.
  • The model offers a significant improvement over existing methods by integrating experimental data.
  • This tool may advance the understanding of lncRNA functions through triplex formation.