Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neural Circuits01:25

Neural Circuits

2.3K
Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
2.3K
Neural Regulation01:37

Neural Regulation

42.4K
Digestion begins with a cephalic phase that prepares the digestive system to receive food. When our brain processes visual or olfactory information about food, it triggers impulses in the cranial nerves innervating the salivary glands and stomach to prepare for food.
42.4K
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

283
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
283

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

High-level visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models.

Nature machine intelligence·2025
Same author

End-to-end topographic networks as models of cortical map formation and human visual behaviour.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

The topology and geometry of neural representations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Emergence of brain-like mirror-symmetric viewpoint tuning in convolutional neural networks.

eLife·2024
Same author

Deep neural networks are not a single hypothesis but a language for expressing computational hypotheses.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same journal

Demonstration of a quantum C-NOT gate in a time-multiplexed fully reconfigurable photonic processor.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Nonlinear quantum light source with van der Waals ferroelectric NbOX<sub>2</sub> (X = Br, I).

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Antagonistic histone H2A variants and autonomous heterochromatin formation shape epigenomic patterns in Arabidopsis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

The long tail of nitrate pollution in groundwater challenges governance of global water quality.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Select microbial metabolites promote tau aggregation in a murine tauopathy model.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Warming climate has lengthened global intense tropical cyclone seasons.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.7K

Individual differences among deep neural network models.

Johannes Mehrer1, Courtney J Spoerer2, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte3

  • 1MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. johannes.mehrer@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.

Nature Communications
|November 13, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in deep neural networks (DNNs) arise from random weight initialization, impacting internal representations despite similar performance. Computational neuroscientists should use multiple DNNs for reliable insights into neural processing.

More Related Videos

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

361
Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research &#8211; Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.7K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

361
Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research &#8211; Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly utilized to model primate brain computations.
  • Individual DNNs, like brains, exhibit unique connectivity and representational profiles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how random weight initialization affects DNN representations.
  • To determine if DNNs trained with different initializations yield comparable insights into neural processing.

Main Methods:

  • Trained multiple DNN instances with identical architectures but varied random weight initializations.
  • Analyzed intermediate and higher-level network representations using systems neuroscience tools.
  • Examined the alignment of category exemplars and centroids within DNNs.

Main Results:

  • Substantial differences in network representations were observed across DNN instances.
  • These representational differences persisted despite similar overall classification performance.
  • The variations originated from under-constrained alignment of category exemplars, not misaligned centroids.

Conclusions:

  • Single DNN instances may not reliably represent neural information processing.
  • Computational neuroscientists should consider using ensembles of multiple DNNs for robust inferences.
  • Random initialization is a critical factor influencing DNN representational geometry.