Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
Published on: December 7, 2018
Clinical Characterization of Oculomotricity in Children with and without Specific Learning Disorders
Carmen Bilbao1, David P Piñero2,3
1Department of Optometry, Policlínica Alto Aragón, 22003 Huesca, Spain.
Insights
Oculomotor abnormalities are common in children with and without specific learning disorders. These eye movement issues, assessed via NSUCO and DEM tests, cannot serve as diagnostic criteria for learning disorders.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Oculomotor problems are frequently observed in children with specific learning disorders (SLDs).
- The potential of oculomotor analysis as a diagnostic tool for SLDs has been explored.
- Understanding the prevalence and nature of oculomotor anomalies in children with and without SLDs is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare oculomotor function between children with SLDs, children with oculomotor abnormalities (OAG), and healthy controls (CG).
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of oculomotor tests (NSUCO and DEM) for identifying SLDs.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, non-randomized comparative study involving 59 children aged 6-13 years.
- Participants were divided into three groups: CG (healthy), OAG (healthy with oculomotor abnormalities), and LDG (diagnosed with SLDs).
- Oculomotor function was assessed using the Northeastern State University College of Optometry's Oculomotor (NSUCO) and Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) tests, alongside a complete eye examination.
Main Results:
- Both OAG and LDG groups exhibited significantly lower NSUCO scores for smooth pursuits and saccades compared to the CG.
- OAG and LDG groups demonstrated significantly longer DEM test reading times and higher DEM ratios than the CG.
- No significant differences in oculomotor test performance were found between the LDG and OAG groups.
Conclusions:
- Oculomotor anomalies are prevalent in children irrespective of the presence of specific learning disorders.
- The findings suggest that oculomotor abnormalities alone are insufficient to serve as diagnostic criteria for specific learning disorders.
- Further research may be needed to elucidate the complex relationship between oculomotor function and learning disabilities.
Abstract:
Children with specific learning disorders have been associated with oculomotor problems, with their analysis even suggested to be a potential diagnostic tool. A prospective non-randomized comparative study evaluating 59 children (6-13 years old) divided into three groups was conducted: a control group (CG) including 15 healthy emmetropic children; a group of 18 healthy children with oculomotor abnormalities (OAG); and a group of 26 children diagnosed with specific learning disorders (LDG). In all groups, besides a complete eye exam, oculomotricity was characterized with two clinical tests: Northeastern State University College of Optometry's Oculomotor (NSUCO) and Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) tests. Concerning the NSUCO test, lower ability, precision, and head/body movement associated scorings were obtained for both smooth pursuits and saccades in OAG and LDG when compared to the CG (p < 0.001). Likewise, significantly longer time needed to read the horizontal sheet of the DEM test and a higher DEM ratio were found in OAG and LDG compared to CG (p ≤ 0.003). No differences between LDG and OAG were found in the performance with the two oculomotor tests (p ≥ 0.141). Oculomotor anomalies can be present in children with and without specific learning disorders, and therefore cannot be used as diagnostic criteria of these type of disorders.
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...

