Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
The Stages of CS: Clinical and Translational Update
David A Baran1, Ashleigh Long2, Jacob C Jentzer3
1Sentara Heart Hospital, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 600 Gresham Drive, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA. docbaran@gmail.com.
Insights
Cardiogenic shock, a complication of acute coronary syndromes, has high mortality. Recent staging systems offer a framework to understand shock severity and guide future targeted treatments for improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Advances in cardiovascular care have increased survival after acute coronary syndromes.
- Cardiogenic shock remains a critical complication with high 30-day mortality.
- Existing definitions of cardiogenic shock lack granularity regarding patient severity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent developments in understanding and classifying cardiogenic shock.
- To contextualize new staging systems within the broader field of acute coronary syndrome management.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature and expert consensus statements on cardiogenic shock classification.
- Analysis of the evolution of clinical definitions and staging frameworks.
Main Results:
- The IABP-SHOCK II trial utilized a basic clinical definition of shock (hypotension and hypoperfusion).
- A new expert consensus statement proposes a multi-stage classification (at risk, beginning, classic, deteriorating, extremis).
- This staging framework has shown rapid validation across diverse patient populations.
Conclusions:
- Accurate classification is crucial for understanding cardiogenic shock and improving patient outcomes.
- Despite technological advances in mechanical support, outcomes for cardiogenic shock have not significantly improved.
- Future research should focus on understanding the complexities of different shock stages to develop targeted therapies.
Purpose Of Review:
With improvements in cardiovascular care, and routine percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction, more patients are surviving following acute coronary syndromes. However, a minority of patients develop cardiogenic shock which results in approximately 50% 30-day mortality. There are various ways to classify cardiogenic shock, and much has been written about this topic in recent years. This review will examine recent developments and put them in context.
Recent Findings:
The large randomized trials of cardiogenic shock treatments such as the IABP-SHOCK II trial used a clinical definition of shock including hypotension (systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or less, or requirement of vasopressors to maintain such a blood pressure), as well as hypoperfusion. However, while this defines a minimum standard to define cardiogenic shock, it does not distinguish between a patient on a single vasoconstrictor and one who is on multiple high dose infusions or one on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention recently published an expert consensus statement defining stages of cardiogenic shock, from at risk to beginning, classic, deteriorating, and extremis cardiogenic shock stages. The simple framework has been validated rapidly in multiple populations including the intensive care unit, a post-myocardial infarction population, an out of hospital cardiac arrest population, and most recently in a multicenter shock collaborative, Classification is fundamental to understanding a disease state, and crafting solutions to improve outcomes. The last 20 years has witnessed an explosion of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices of increasing sophistication and capability, and yet there has been little progress in improving outcomes of cardiogenic shock. Hopefully, the next 20 years will see massive advances in understanding of the complexities of the various stages of cardiogenic shock. With such knowledge, it is likely that targeted treatments will be developed and the mortality of this disease will finally plummet.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Improving Translational Accuracy

