Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Collecting the Brain and Serum from the Same Mice Fetus to Study Brain Tumor Development
Published on: May 17, 2024
Profiling the Word Reading Abilities of School-Age Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Shelley S Arnold1,2, Jonathan M Payne3,4, Genevieve McArthur5
1Kids Neuroscience Centre, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Insights
Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) often struggle with reading. This study found that working memory, language skills, and attention predict reading success in these children.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Genetics
Background:
- Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic disorder associated with significant learning challenges.
- Reading difficulties are a prevalent issue among children diagnosed with NF1.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and categorize reading impairments in children with NF1.
- To determine predictors of poor reading skills in this population.
Main Methods:
- Compared reading abilities of 60 children with NF1 (aged 7-12) to 36 typically developing children.
- Classified poor readers with NF1 based on impairment type (phonological, surface, mixed).
- Used hierarchical multiple regression to identify predictors of word reading.
Main Results:
- Children with NF1 showed significantly lower literacy skills than controls.
- Among NF1 poor readers, 41% had phonological dyslexia, 49% had mixed dyslexia.
- Mixed dyslexia presented the most severe reading impairments; better working memory, receptive language, and fewer inattentive behaviors predicted better word reading.
Conclusions:
- Most children with NF1 experience deficits in essential reading skills.
- Weaknesses in working memory, receptive language, and attention are linked to reading difficulties in NF1.
Objective:
Reading difficulties are one of the most significant challenges for children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The aims of this study were to identify and categorize the types of reading impairments experienced by children with NF1 and to establish predictors of poor reading in this population.
Method:
Children aged 7-12 years with NF1 (n = 60) were compared with typically developing children (n = 36). Poor word readers with NF1 were classified according to impairment type (i.e., phonological, surface, mixed), and their reading subskills were compared. A hierarchical multiple regression was conducted to identify predictors of word reading.
Results:
Compared to controls, children with NF1 demonstrated significantly poorer literacy abilities. Of the 49 children with NF1 classified as poor readers, 20 (41%) were classified with phonological dyslexia, 24 (49%) with mixed dyslexia, and 5 (10%) fell outside classification categories. Children with mixed dyslexia displayed the most severe reading impairments. Stronger working memory, better receptive language, and fewer inattentive behaviors predicted better word reading skills.
Conclusions:
The majority of children with NF1 experience deficits in key reading skills which are essential for them to become successful readers. Weaknesses in working memory, receptive language, and attention are associated with reading difficulties in children with NF1.

