Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

09:34
Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
34.4K
A decision aid for additional findings in genomic sequencing: Development and pilot testing
Amanda S Freed1, Inga Gruß2, Carmit K McMullen2
1Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Patient Education and Counseling
|November 16, 2020
Summary
A new web-based tool, the Optional Results Choice Aid (ORCA), helps patients and research participants make informed decisions about receiving additional genomic sequencing results. ORCA was found to be readable, acceptable, and relevant during testing.
Area of Science:
- Genomic Medicine
- Bioethics
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Genomic sequencing generates vast amounts of data, including incidental findings.
- Patients and research participants face complex decisions regarding the disclosure of additional genomic results.
- Informed decision-making is crucial for patient autonomy and ethical research practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and describe a patient-facing, web-based decision aid to support informed, values-based choices about receiving additional genomic sequencing results.
- To create a tool that enhances patient understanding and engagement in genomic data interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Development followed the International Patient Decision Aids Standards.
- Utilized literature review, focus groups, and alpha testing with participants undergoing clinical genomic sequencing.
- Incorporated a values clarification exercise, patient quotes, and user guidance.
Main Results:
- The decision aid, Optional Results Choice Aid (ORCA), was developed.
- Alpha testing indicated the tool is highly readable, acceptable, and relevant to users.
- ORCA includes a seven-question values clarification exercise and illustrative patient quotes.
Conclusions:
- ORCA effectively supports informed, values-based decision-making for genomic sequencing results.
- The tool is being implemented in the NHGRI-funded Cancer Health Assessment Reaching Many (CHARM) study.
- Future work will measure informed values-choice congruence in a real-world setting.
Keywords:
Decision aidDecision makingDecision support toolsExome sequencingGenomic sequencingIncidental findingsInformed choiceSecondary findingsMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
96.3K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
96.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
6.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.7K

