Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Cornary Intervention for Patients with Angina Pectoris
Hiroki Shinohara1, Satoshi Kodera1, Arihiro Kiyosue1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not significantly improve all-cause mortality for angina pectoris (AP). However, FFR-guided PCI reduced the composite of mortality and myocardial infarction compared to non-FFR-guided PCI and medical treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) evaluation is recommended before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for angina pectoris (AP).
- The prognostic benefit of FFR-guided PCI over other treatments remains incompletely established.
- This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to clarify the comparative effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of FFR-guided PCI versus non-FFR-guided PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and medical treatment (MT) for patients with AP.
- To assess the impact of FFR-guided PCI on all-cause mortality and a composite of mortality and myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases for studies published between 2000 and 2018.
- A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed on 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 18,093 patients.
- Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to compare treatment outcomes.
Main Results:
- FFR-guided PCI showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality compared to CABG, non-FFR-guided PCI, or MT.
- For the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (12 RCTs, 15,454 patients), FFR-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk compared to non-FFR-guided PCI (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95) and MT (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95).
- No evidence of inconsistency was found among the included studies.
Conclusions:
- While FFR-guided PCI did not demonstrate a significant improvement in overall prognosis compared to non-FFR-guided PCI, CABG, or MT, it offers a potential benefit.
- FFR-guided PCI may significantly reduce the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction when compared to non-FFR-guided PCI and MT.
- Further research may be warranted to fully elucidate the long-term prognostic advantages of FFR implementation in routine clinical practice.
Abstract:
Evaluation of hemodynamic parameters, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), is recommended before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with angina pectoris (AP). However, the advantage of FFR-guided PCI has not been fully established. This study was performed to confirm whether FFR-guided PCI improves the prognosis compared with other treatments. Multiple databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to 2018, and a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare outcomes of FFR-guided PCI, non-FFR-guided PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and medical treatment (MT) for AP based on estimated odds ratios (ORs). The study included 18,093 patients from 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). No evidence of inconsistency was observed among the studies. The NMA showed that the all-cause mortality of FFR-guided PCI was not significantly different from that of the other treatment groups (CABG: OR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.7; non-FFR-guided PCI: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.53-1.4; and MT: OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.52-1.3). The NMA for the composite of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction, which included 15,454 patients from 12 RCTs, showed that FFR-guided PCI significantly reduced the composite outcome compared with non-FFR-guided PCI and MT (non-FFR-guided PCI: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95 and MT: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95). Although FFR-guided PCI for AP did not show significant prognostic improvement compared with non-FFR-guided PCI, CABG, and MT, FFR-guided PCI may significantly reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction compared with non-FFR-guided PCI and MT.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...

