Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
Published on: August 26, 2018
The impact of the face-to-face consultation on decisional conflict in complex decision-making in multiple sclerosis:
David Daniel Wilkie1, Alessandra Solari2, Richard St John Nicholas1
1Centre for Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Background:
The role of face-to-face consultations in medicine is increasingly being challenged. Disease activity, national guidelines, life goals e.g. pregnancy, multiple therapies and side effects need to be considered on starting disease modifying treatments (DMTs) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).
Objectives:
We studied the impact of a face-to-face consultation on decision making, using decisional conflict (DC) as the primary outcome.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study of 73 pwMS attending clinics who were making decisions about DMTs followed for one year. Prerequisites and consultation features were measured with the SURE scale for DC used as the primary outcome at baseline and at one year.
Results:
The patient activation measure (PAM) was the only driver prior to the consultation associated with DC (p = 0.02) showing those less engaged were more likely to have DC. Overall, 51/73 (70%) of people made their treatment decision or reinforced a former decision during the consultation. We found making a treatment decision between the original consultation and the follow-up was associated with resolving DC (p = 0.008).
Conclusions:
Patient engagement impacts DC but the HCP delivering the optimal Shared Decision Making (SDM) approach is additionally significant in reducing DC. In complex decisions there is a clear role for face-to-face consultations in current practice.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:20Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II