Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Calculating Heart Rate Variability from ECG Data from Youth with Cerebral Palsy During Active Video Game Sessions
Published on: June 5, 2019
Assessment of autonomous nerve system through non-linear heart rate variability outcomes in sedentary healthy adults
Gines Navarro-Lomas1, Alejandro De-la-O1, Lucas Jurado-Fasoli1
1EFFECTS-262 Research Group, Department of Physiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Background:
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a psycho-physiological phenomenon with broad health implications. Different data analysis methods have been used to assess the autonomic nervous system activity, but the validation of new indexes that accurately describe its balance through non-invasive methods (i.e., HRV analysis) is of clinical interest. This study aimed: (i) to evaluate the association of the Stress Score (SS) and the Sympathetic/Parasympathetic Ratio (S/PS) with time domain and frequency domain analysis of HRV, and (ii) to set reference values of SS and S/PS in sedentary healthy adults.
Methods:
A total of 156 sedentary healthy adults (38.4 ± 15.57 years old, 81 women), aged were involved in this study. HRV was measured for 15 min in a supine position at rest. SS and S/PS were calculated from the non-linear HRV analyses based on Poincare Plot.
Results:
Stress Score showed a non-linear negative power-law relationship with SDNN (β = -0.969; R 2 = 0.963; P < 0.001), RMSSD (β = -0.867; R 2 = 0.722; P < 0.001), high frequency (β = -0.834; R 2 = 0.752; P =< 0.001), low frequency (β = -0.627; R 2 = 0.330; P < 0.001), SD1 (β = -0.867; R 2 = 0.722; P < 0.001) and SD2 (β = -1.000; R 2 > 0.999; P < 0.001). There was observed a negative cubic relationship between SS with PNN50 (β = -1.972; R 2 = 0.644; P < 0.001). A linear regression model was conducted between SS with Ratio Low/High Frequency (β = 0.026; R 2 < 0.001; P = 0.750). Non-linear power-law regression models were built between S/PS and SDNN (β = -0.990; R 2 = 0.981; P < 0.001), RMSSD (β = -0.973; R 2 = 0.939; P < 0.001), high frequency (β = -0.928; R 2 = 0.970; P < 0.001), low frequency (β = -2.344; R 2 = 0.557; P < 0.001), SD1 (β = -0.973; R 2 = 0.939; P < 0.001) and SD2 (β = -0.611; R 2 = 0.908; P < 0.001). A non-linear negative regression model was built between S/PS and PNN50 (β = -3.412; R 2 = 0.868; P < 0.001). A linear regression model was conducted between S/PS and SD2/SD1 (β = 0.075; R 2 = 0.006; P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Our results support the use of SS as a sympathetic activity marker, and S/PS as an indicator of the sympathetic and parasympathetic activity of the autonomic nervous system in sedentary healthy adults.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
Regulation of Heart Rates
The SNS increases heart rate through the release of norepinephrine and epinephrine, which act on beta-1 adrenergic receptors in the heart. This action increases the rate of depolarization in the sinoatrial (SA) node, the heart's...
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Regulation of Pulse

