Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025
Robotic Enucleation of an Intra-Pancreatic Insulinoma in the Pancreatic Head
Published on: January 3, 2020
Endoscopic submucosal dissection as alternative to surgery for complicated gastric heterotopic pancreas
Jin Hee Noh1, Do Hoon Kim2, So-Woon Kim3
1Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, South Korea.
Background:
Gastric heterotopic pancreas (GHP) is generally asymptomatic and rarely features complications such as pancreatitis, pseudocysts, gastric outlet obstruction, bleeding, obstructive jaundice, or intussusception. However, the treatment of complicated GHP is challenging and often requires surgical resection.
Aim:
To investigate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as alternative to surgical resection for complicated GHP.
Methods:
This is a single-center, retrospective study. Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 5 patients underwent ESD for complicated GHP at Asan Medical Center. Patients who were diagnosed with complicated GHP were treated conservatively as with general practice for acute pancreatitis. After conservative management for resolving the acute phase of pancreatitis, ESD was performed as definitive treatment for complicated GHP. ESD was performed using the conventional method under conscious sedation. The clinical features of patients and tumors, procedure-related characteristics, and long-term outcomes were investigated.
Results:
The age of the 5 patients ranged from 28-43 years. Two of the patients were males. All lesions were located in the greater curvature of the antrum. On endoscopic ultrasonography during the pain episode, all lesions were located across the muscularis mucosa, submucosa, and proper muscle layers. The median lesion size was 20 [interquartile range (IQR), 18-35] during the pain episode at the time of the diagnosis of complicated GHP, and 15 mm (IQR, 9-33) at the time of ESD after conservative treatment. The procedure time ranged from 15-120 min. There were no procedure-related adverse events such as perforation or bleeding. The length of hospital stay after the procedure ranged from 2-4 d. All patients were symptom free during the median follow-up period of 46.0 mo (IQR, 39-60).
Conclusion:
ESD appears to be a feasible and effective treatment option for complicated GHP based on the favorable clinical outcomes.
