Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Lateral subvastus lateralis versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric
Sahil Prabhnoor Sidhu1, Alireza Moslemian1, Geofrey Yamomo1
1Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
The standard of care for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a medial parapatellar approach (MPA). We aimed to study a novel lateral subvastus lateralis approach (SLA), which offers the benefit of keeping the extensor mechanism and medial soft tissues intact. To ensure the approach could be used safely in vivo, a biomechanical study was performed to assess whether the joint kinematics would be preserved after performing a TKA.
Methods:
A biomechanical study was conducted using 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, with seven specimens each for the MPA and SLA. After a single radius, cemented cruciate retaining TKA was performed, specimens were tested on a VIVO joint motion simulator to measure and compare anterior/posterior, internal/external, and varus/valgus kinematics and laxity.
Results:
There was no significant difference in joint kinematics or laxity between the SLA and MPA groups.
Conclusion:
Both the SLA and MPA offer similar knee kinematics and laxity based on a cadaveric model. Although the surgical approach was different, inherently releasing different ligaments, both approaches resulted in a stable knee. This suggests that either approach will enable the surgeon to provide a stable knee, and that the implant itself may contribute a significant portion of the knee's kinematics.
