Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges
Angela Sy1, Traci Hayes2, Kelly Laurila3
1Department of Tropical Medicine, Medical Microbiology, and Pharmacology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
This study developed an evaluation framework for the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program to measure its impact on health disparities research. It identified common metrics and challenges for future collaborative efforts.
Area of Science:
- Health Disparities Research
- Program Evaluation
- Health Equity
Background:
- The NIH-funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program supports 18 institutions.
- RCMI aims to strengthen research environments and contributions to health disparities research.
Purpose of the Study:
- Establish a uniform evaluation framework for the RCMI research consortium.
- Demonstrate the collective success and impact of RCMI institutions on health disparities.
Main Methods:
- Multiphase mixed-methods study.
- Included RCMI Evaluators' Workshop discussions, literature review, and a case study survey.
- Ten RCMIs participated in the workshop; 14 submitted survey responses.
Main Results:
- Developed the RCMI Evaluation Conceptual Model for documenting impacts.
- Identified 37 common evaluation metrics across four categories.
- Highlighted challenges including limited resources, data collection, and metric definition.
Conclusions:
- A practical framework and common metrics are established to document RCMI impacts.
- Collaborative efforts are needed to address evaluation challenges and enhance measurement.
- Engaging program leadership and stakeholders is crucial for inter-institutional comparisons and community impact.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Overview of Minitab

