Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

05:49
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.2K
Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence for Proximal Caries Detection.
F Schwendicke1, J G Rossi1, G Göstemeyer2
1Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Journal of Dental Research
|November 17, 2020
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) significantly improves dental caries detection accuracy on radiographs compared to dentists alone. This AI-assisted approach is more cost-effective, leading to better tooth retention and fewer undetected lesions.
Area of Science:
- Dental diagnostics
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential in assisting dentists with image assessment, particularly for caries detection.
- The broader health and economic implications of integrating AI into dental diagnostics remain largely unevaluated.
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of AI for proximal caries detection on bitewing radiographs is crucial for understanding its clinical value.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of proximal caries detection on bitewing radiographs with and without the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).
- To assess the impact of AI on diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes (tooth retention), and healthcare costs from a German mixed-payer perspective.
Main Methods:
- A U-Net convolutional neural network was trained, validated, and tested on 3,293, 252, and 141 bitewing radiographs, respectively.
- A Markov model simulated patient outcomes over a lifetime, considering true/false positives/negatives and subsequent treatment decisions.
- Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and Monte-Carlo microsimulations, with tooth retention years as the health outcome.
Main Results:
- AI demonstrated higher accuracy (0.80) compared to dentists (mean 0.71) and significantly greater sensitivity (0.75 vs. 0.36).
- AI-assisted detection was associated with improved tooth retention (64 years) and lower costs (298 euro) versus non-AI assessment (62 years; 322 euro).
- The ICER indicated that AI was dominant (cost-saving and more effective), with AI being less costly and more effective in over 77% of scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Implementing AI for dental caries detection on bitewing radiographs is likely cost-effective, primarily due to improved detection rates and reduced missed lesions.
- The cost-effectiveness is contingent on dentists managing detected early-stage lesions non-restoratively, aligning with AI's diagnostic capabilities.
- AI offers a valuable tool for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and optimizing resource allocation in dental care.
Keywords:
caries diagnosis/preventioncomputer simulationdecision makingdentaleconomic evaluationradiology
