Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting01:29

Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting

1.3K
Documentation in long-term care facilities and home healthcare settings is crucial for ensuring continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care for patients. Each setting has its specific documentation processes and tools:
Long-Term Care Facilities
1.3K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

16.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

1.3K
The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
1.3K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

1.1K
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
1.1K
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

5.4K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
5.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Evolution and Adoption of a Standardized Letter of Evaluation for OBGYN Residency Applicants.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same author

Combined emergency cesarean section followed by immediate repair of acute type A aortic dissection in Marfan patient at 27 weeks gestation.

JTCVS techniques·2026
Same author

Reimagining residency selection: a lottery among the qualified.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Residency Preparation Courses: What Is the Durable Impact Beyond Medical School?

Medical science educator·2026
Same author

From Bytes to Bedside: Exploring the Impact of AI on Medicine and Education.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2025
Same author

Secondary Traumatic Stress in Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty, House Officers, and Certified Nurse Midwives.

Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)·2025
Same journal

"The Absence of Criticism Constitutes Sufficient Praise?" Development and Implementation of a "Feedback Team Time-Out" in Surgical Training.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Closing the Feedback Loop: The Feed Protocol for AI-Driven Curricular Reform in Surgical Residency.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

360° Virtual Reality Observation in Neurosurgical Clerkship: A Comparative Study With Surgical Assistant Participation and Conventional Monitor Viewing.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Surgical Case Creation.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

The Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Application and Evaluation of a Formative Feedback Rubric on Nontechnical Skills Using Retrospective SIMPL App Data in General Surgery Residents.

Journal of surgical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 30, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.5K

Stakeholder Perspectives on Standardizing the Residency Application and Interview Processes.

Maya M Hammoud1, Abigail Ford Winkel2, Eric A Strand3

  • 1University of Michigan, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Learning Health Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Journal of Surgical Education
|November 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Stakeholders overwhelmingly support new obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency application standards, finding them feasible and effective in reducing applicant anxiety. These guidelines enhance the residency application process for future physicians.

Keywords:
graduate medical educationinterviewsresidency applicationsresidency selectionstandard timeline

More Related Videos

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

72.0K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 30, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.5K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

72.0K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Residency Training
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Background:

  • The obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency application and interview process has faced scrutiny regarding its efficiency and impact on applicants.
  • Standardization of application processes is crucial for ensuring fairness and reducing variability in medical education.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate stakeholder perspectives on proposed standards for the OBGYN residency application and interview cycle (2019-2020).
  • To assess the acceptance, feasibility, and impact of these standards on applicant anxiety.

Main Methods:

  • An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to OBGYN residency applicants, clerkship directors, student affairs deans, program directors, and program managers.
  • A 15-item Likert scale survey assessed the importance, adoption, and effect of proposed guidelines on applicant anxiety.
  • Multiple regression analysis identified factors associated with compliance.

Main Results:

  • A total of 1358 participants completed the survey with an overall response rate of 39.26%.
  • All stakeholder groups rated the proposed guidelines as important to extremely important.
  • Over 90% of program directors reported compliance, and over 90% of applicants, clerkship directors, and student affairs deans felt the standards reduced anxiety.

Conclusions:

  • Universal standards for the OBGYN residency application process are feasible and widely accepted by stakeholders.
  • The implemented guidelines were perceived as important and successfully decreased anxiety among applicants.
  • These findings offer a model for other medical specialties considering similar standardization efforts.