An experimental test of the Allee effect range limitation hypothesis
Samuel A Merker1, Richard B Chandler1
1Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
The Journal of Animal Ecology
|November 17, 2020
Summary
Socially mediated Allee effects do not limit Canada warbler populations at range edges. Climate factors and density dependence, not social cues, influence population growth, suggesting minimal role for Allee effects in species distribution.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Climate Change Biology
Background:
- Species distributions are influenced by abiotic and biotic factors.
- Socially mediated Allee effects, where scarce social information limits population growth at range edges, are theoretically proposed to affect species distributions.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for predicting climate change impacts on trailing-edge populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if socially mediated Allee effects limit the geographic distribution of the Canada warbler (Cardellina canadensis) at the trailing edge of its range.
- To test predictions that local growth rates correlate with density and that adding social cues can promote colonization and increase growth rates.
- To investigate the role of abiotic factors versus social cues in limiting population growth.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 4 years of observational data from 71 sites and experimental data from 10 sites.
- Conducted experiments adding social cues to formerly unoccupied sites to test for colonization and increased growth rates.
- Analyzed the influence of local density, temperature, precipitation, and negative density dependence on population growth rates.
Main Results:
- No colonization of experimental sites occurred after the addition of social cues.
- No evidence of Allee effects limiting Canada warbler distribution was found.
- Population growth rates were significantly influenced by temperature, precipitation, and negative density dependence, not social cues.
Conclusions:
- Socially mediated Allee effects appear to play a minimal role in limiting the distribution of Canada warblers at their trailing-edge range.
- Abiotic factors (temperature, precipitation) and negative density dependence are stronger drivers of population growth rates in this species.
- Empirical findings challenge theoretical models suggesting Allee effects significantly accelerate climate-induced range shifts or local extinctions.
Related Concept Videos
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
422
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
422
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
3.0K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.0K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
5.1K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
5.1K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
339
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
339
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
299
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
299
McNemar's Test
643
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
643


