Revisiting Facial Age Estimation With New Insights From Instance Space Analysis

When demonstrating the effectiveness of a new algorithm, researchers are traditionally encouraged to compare their algorithm's performance against existing algorithms on well-studied benchmark test suites. In the absence of more nuanced methodologies, algorithm performance is typically summarized on average across the test suite examples. This paper highlights the potential bias of conclusions drawn by analyzing "on average" performance, and the opportunities offered by a recent testing methodology known as instance space analysis. To illustrate, we revisit our 2007 comparative study of algorithms for facial age estimation, and rigorously stress-test to challenge the original conclusions. The case study demonstrates how powerful visualizations offered by instance space analysis enable greater insights into unique strengths and weaknesses, and which algorithm should be used when and why. Inspired by such insights, a new algorithm is proposed, and its unique advantage is demonstrated. The bias often hidden in well-studied datasets, and the ramifications for drawing biased conclusions, are also illustrated in this case study. While focused on facial age estimation, the methodology and lessons learned from the case study are broadly applicable to any study seeking to draw conclusions about algorithm performance based on empirical results.