Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

7.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
7.0K
The Fossil Record02:56

The Fossil Record

26.6K
The fossil record documents only a small fraction of all organisms that have ever inhabited Earth. Fossilization is a rare process, and most organisms never become fossils. Moreover, the fossil record only exhibits fossils that have been discovered. Nevertheless, sedimentary rock fossils of long-lived, abundant, hard-bodied organisms dominate the fossil record. These fossils offer valuable information, such as an organism's physical form, behavior, and age. Studying the fossil record helps...
26.6K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

63.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
63.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

254.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
254.2K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial expressions of concern are infrequent even for researchers with multiple retracted publications - An observational study.

Accountability in research·2026
Same author

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text message and financial incentives for weight management in men with obesity: The Game of Stones RCT.

Public health research (Southampton, England)·2026
Same author

Repeated Measurements of Vitamin D: Common and Very Unlikely to Indicate Deficiency.

Clinical endocrinology·2026
Same author

Cost-savings from fracture prevention with zoledronate in randomised controlled trials.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2026
Same author

High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

PRECISION study: impact of personalised cardiac anaesthesia and cerebral autoregulation on neurological outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery - protocol for an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Development, validity, and reliability of the pre-attendance conference evaluator (PACE) tool for identifying predatory conferences.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Managing manuscripts with potential dual-use research of concern: A thematic analysis of life science journal policies.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Researching retraction: Do we need more rules or more honesty?

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Accountability in evidence syntheses: On the need for rigorous peer review and reporting guidelines.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policies.

Accountability in research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 29, 2025

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon
08:18

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon

Published on: June 16, 2020

7.8K

Correcting the scientific record - A broken system?

Mark J Bolland1,2, Andrew Grey1, Alison Avenell3

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Accountability in Research
|November 18, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The current system for assessing publication integrity is flawed. We propose independent panels to transparently evaluate and report on research integrity concerns.

Keywords:
Publication integrityexpression of concernretraction

More Related Videos

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

153
Removal of Exogenous Materials from the Outer Portion of Frozen Cores to Investigate the Ancient Biological Communities Harbored Inside
09:06

Removal of Exogenous Materials from the Outer Portion of Frozen Cores to Investigate the Ancient Biological Communities Harbored Inside

Published on: July 3, 2016

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 29, 2025

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon
08:18

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon

Published on: June 16, 2020

7.8K
Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

153
Removal of Exogenous Materials from the Outer Portion of Frozen Cores to Investigate the Ancient Biological Communities Harbored Inside
09:06

Removal of Exogenous Materials from the Outer Portion of Frozen Cores to Investigate the Ancient Biological Communities Harbored Inside

Published on: July 3, 2016

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Research integrity
  • Scholarly communication

Background:

  • Current methods for assessing publication integrity are slow and opaque.
  • Readers lack sufficient information to evaluate publication integrity.
  • Existing systems are inconsistent and inadequate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel system for assessing publication integrity.
  • To enhance transparency in reporting integrity concerns.
  • To establish independent bodies for integrity assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Establishment of independent panels.
  • Assessment of publication integrity.
  • Transparent reporting of assessment outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The proposed system aims to overcome current inefficiencies.
  • Independent panels will provide objective assessments.
  • Transparent reporting ensures readers are informed.

Conclusions:

  • A new, independent process can improve publication integrity assessment.
  • Transparency and independence are key to reader confidence.
  • This model addresses the inadequacy of current systems.