Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025
Author Spotlight: Standardization and Best Practices for Advancing Lung Imaging Using 129Xe MRI
Published on: November 21, 2023
Diagnostic Confidence and Feasibility of a Deep Learning Accelerated HASTE Sequence of the Abdomen in a Single
Judith Herrmann1, Sebastian Gassenmaier1, Dominik Nickel2
1From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a single breath-hold fast half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequence using a deep learning reconstruction (HASTEDL) for T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen as compared with 2 standard T2-weighted imaging sequences (HASTE and BLADE).
Materials And Methods:
Sixty-six patients who underwent 1.5-T liver magnetic resonance imaging were included in this monocentric, retrospective study. The following T2-weighted sequences in axial orientation and using spectral fat suppression were compared: a conventional respiratory-triggered BLADE sequence (time of acquisition [TA] = 4:00 minutes), a conventional multiple breath-hold HASTE sequence (HASTES) (TA = 1:30 minutes), as well as a single breath-hold HASTE with deep learning reconstruction (HASTEDL) (TA = 0:16 minutes). Two radiologists assessed the 3 sequences regarding overall image quality, noise, sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detectability as well as lesion characterization using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 with 4 being the best. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between the 3 sequences.
Results:
HASTEDL was successfully acquired in all patients. Overall image quality for HASTEDL was rated as good (median, 3; interquartile range, 3-4) and was significantly superior to HASTEs (P < 0.001) and inferior to BLADE (P = 0.001). Noise, sharpness, and artifacts for HASTEDL reached similar levels to BLADE (P ≤ 0.176) and were significantly superior to HASTEs (P < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence for HASTEDL was rated excellent by both readers and significantly superior to HASTEs (P < 0.001) and inferior to BLADE (P = 0.044). Lesion detectability and lesion characterization for HASTEDL reached similar levels to those of BLADE (P ≤ 0.523) and were significantly superior to HASTEs (P < 0.001). Concerning the number of detected lesions and the measured diameter of the largest lesion, no significant differences were found comparing BLADE, HASTES, and HASTEDL (P ≤ 0.912).
Conclusions:
The single breath-hold HASTEDL is feasible and yields comparable image quality and diagnostic confidence to standard T2-weighted TSE BLADE and may therefore allow for a remarkable time saving in abdominal imaging.
