Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care

625
Surgical management and nursing care are crucial in treating Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD). Here is an organized and enhanced overview of the surgical interventions and the associated nursing care for PUD:
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
625
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

324
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
324
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

375
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
375

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transforming Clinical Skills Training: Integrating OSCE into Team-Based Learning for teaching undergraduate medical students.

Pakistan journal of medical sciences·2026
Same author

Cannabis for tic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its efficacy in Tourette syndrome management.

Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Impact of plant fiber reinforcement on mechanical properties of PMMA denture base resin: a systematic review.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry·2026
Same author

Management and outcomes of people presenting with new diabetes-related foot infections: a prospective observational study from Australia and New Zealand.

BMJ open diabetes research & care·2026
Same author

Pesticide residue detection techniques for increasing productivity and yield: recent progress and future outlooks.

Frontiers in plant science·2025
Same author

'Malignant granular cell tumor of the Appendiceal orifice: a rare case and review of literature'.

Oxford medical case reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Laparoscopic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection via Inferior Infracolic Approach: A Surgical Approach for Benign Lesions
03:34

Laparoscopic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection via Inferior Infracolic Approach: A Surgical Approach for Benign Lesions

Published on: February 9, 2024

635

Laparoscopy: A Better Approach for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer.

Muhammad Faisal Murad1, Rafeya Khan2, Maham Tariq2

  • 1Surgery, Maroof International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK.

Cureus
|November 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU) is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery. This minimally invasive approach leads to shorter hospital stays, faster mobilization, and fewer complications, making it a preferred method for PDU treatment.

Keywords:
graham patch repairlaparoscopyperforated duodenal ulcer

More Related Videos

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery
04:03

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery

Published on: March 28, 2025

354
Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
08:57

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: June 17, 2018

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Laparoscopic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection via Inferior Infracolic Approach: A Surgical Approach for Benign Lesions
03:34

Laparoscopic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection via Inferior Infracolic Approach: A Surgical Approach for Benign Lesions

Published on: February 9, 2024

635
Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery
04:03

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery

Published on: March 28, 2025

354
Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
08:57

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: June 17, 2018

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Gastrointestinal surgery
  • Surgical outcomes

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly standard for abdominal procedures.
  • Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU) remains debated.
  • This study compares laparoscopic versus open PDU repair.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic PDU repair.
  • To compare outcomes between laparoscopic and open Graham patch repair.
  • To assess operative time, recovery, and complications.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study of 101 patients with PDU.
  • 36 patients underwent laparoscopic repair, 65 underwent open repair.
  • Data collected on operative time, analgesia, mobilization, and hospital stay.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic repair had a longer mean operative time (74.01 vs 56.17 minutes).
  • Laparoscopic repair showed significantly shorter recovery: analgesia (1.21 vs 3.83 days), mobilization (9.32 vs 16.20 hours), and hospital stay (3.12 vs 4.85 days).
  • Postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopic group (8% vs 54%).

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic repair of PDU is safe and effective.
  • It offers advantages in reduced hospital stay, faster mobilization, and fewer complications.
  • Expertise is crucial for optimal outcomes in laparoscopic PDU repair.