Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

People in more individualist cultures are more motivated to make others feel better.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The Scammers' Psychological Warfare: A Call to Arms.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2026
Same author

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same author

Multi-party open-ended conversation with a social robot.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Disclosure decisions: the combined effects of reciprocity, comparisons, and question sequences.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Efficacy and effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder: From lab to reality.

Science robotics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 29, 2025

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.5K

The Robot Made Me Do It: Human-Robot Interaction and Risk-Taking Behavior.

Yaniv Hanoch1, Francesco Arvizzigno2, Daniel Hernandez García3

  • 1Southampton Business School, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking
|November 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Robots can influence human risk-taking behavior. Encouragement from a robot increased risk-taking, but a robot's mere presence did not, suggesting potential benefits and risks of human-robot interaction.

Keywords:
human–robot interactionpeer pressurerisk takingrobot

More Related Videos

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K
Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
13:44

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy

Published on: August 8, 2011

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 29, 2025

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.5K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K
Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
13:44

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy

Published on: August 8, 2011

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Human-robot interaction
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Behavioral science

Background:

  • Peer pressure is known to influence human risk-taking.
  • Robots are increasingly integrated into human environments.
  • The impact of robots on human decision-making, specifically risk-taking, requires investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if robots can influence human risk-taking behavior.
  • To compare the effects of an encouraging robot versus a silent robot on risk-taking.
  • To understand the implications of robot-induced risk-taking in human decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a measure of risk-taking.
  • Compared participant behavior in three conditions: alone, with a silent robot, and with an encouraging robot.
  • BART serves as a proxy for real-world risk-taking behavior.

Main Results:

  • Participants encouraged by a robot exhibited increased risk-taking behavior.
  • The mere presence of a silent robot did not significantly alter risk-taking.
  • Robot encouragement, not just presence, was the key factor in modifying risk behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Robots can actively influence human risk-taking, similar to peer pressure.
  • The findings highlight potential benefits and drawbacks of robots in human decision-making contexts.
  • Further research is needed to explore the emerging consequences of robot-influenced risk-taking.