Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

03:07
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
508
Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Frozen Section Practice: An Enterprise Audit as a Guide for Moving Forward
Rebecca Czaja1, Ruizhe Wu2, Julie M Jorns1
1From the Department of Pathology (Czaja, Jorns), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|November 19, 2020
Summary
Sentinel lymph node evaluation using frozen section (FS) is declining. Standard serial sectioning of sentinel lymph nodes is effective, with few false negatives for macrometastatic disease.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Pathology
- Breast Cancer Management
Background:
- Decreased utilization of frozen section (FS) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation in breast cancer.
- Reduced emphasis on identifying small SLN metastases due to less aggressive surgical approaches.
- Need to assess current enterprise performance in SLN evaluation via FS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate institutional performance in evaluating axillary sentinel lymph nodes using frozen section (FS).
- To inform potential changes in processing protocols for SLN evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of SLN and nonsentinel lymph nodes from 426 patients (August 2017-July 2019).
- Evaluation of grossing technique and discordance between FS and permanent section (PS).
- Assessment of clinicopathologic features and adherence to serial sectioning at 2-mm intervals.
Main Results:
- Serial sectioning at 2-mm intervals was performed in 78.2% of cases, significantly lower in community sites (23.3%) vs. academic (87.1%).
- Overall discordance rate was 4.8% (21/432), all being false negatives.
- Of false negatives, 33.3% had macrometastatic disease; 15/16 sampling errors were detected on the first PS level.
Conclusions:
- Standard serial sectioning of SLNs at 2-mm intervals yields infrequent false negatives for macrometastatic disease.
- A single additional permanent section level is considered reasonable, provided serial sectioning protocols are followed.

