Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
Published on: September 17, 2021
Reentrant melting and multiple occupancy crystals of bounded potentials: Simple theory and direct observation by
1Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2BP, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Aspects of the phase coexistence behavior of the generalized exponential model (GEM-m) and bounded versions of inverse power potentials based on theory and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation data are reported. The GEM-m potential is ϕ(r)=exp(-r^{m}), where r is the pair separation and m is an adjustable exponent. A simple analytic formula for the fluid-solid envelope of the Gaussian core model which takes account of the known low- and high-density limiting forms is proposed and shown to represent the simulation data well. The bounded inverse power (BIP) potential is ϕ(r)=1/(a^{q}+r^{q})^{n/q}, where a, n, and q are positive constants. The BIP potential multiple occupancy crystal or cluster crystals are predicted to form when q>2 and a>0, for n>3, which compares with the corresponding GEM-m condition of m>2. Reentrant melting should occur for the BIP potential when q≤2 and a>0. MD simulations in which the system was gradually compressed at constant temperature using the BIP potential produced cluster states in the parameter domain expected but it was not possible to establish conclusively whether a multiply occupied crystal or a cluster fluid had formed owing to assembly structural fluctuations. The random phase approximation reproduces very well the BIP MD energy per particle without any discontinuities at the phase boundaries. The Lindemann melting rule is shown analytically to give a more rapidly decaying reentrant melting curve boundary than the so-called melting indicator (MI) empirical melting criterion which has also been investigated in this study. The MI model gives a better match to the high-density phase boundary for small m and q values.
More Related Videos
11:27X-Ray Crystallography to Study the Oligomeric State Transition of the Thermotoga maritima M42 Aminopeptidase TmPep1050
Published on: May 13, 2020
08:55Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Molecular and Ionic Solids
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
Recrystallization: Solid–Solution Equilibria
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing