Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Cardiovascular safety of Glimepiride: An indirect comparison from CAROLINA and CARMELINA
Sujoy Ghosh1, Pradip Mukhopadhyay1, Prabhakar Pandey2
1Department of Endocrinology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, India.
Background:
Despite having unquestionable glucose lowering efficacy, current guidelines no more favour the uses of sulphonylureas for CV safety concern, except when cost is an issue. However, formal cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOT) is not available.
Materials And Methods:
We performed an indirect treatment comparison to find the hazard ratio for 3-point MACE, all-cause death, CV death and non-CV death between glimepiride and placebo based on two large CVOTs which established the CV safety of linagliptin (CARMELINA and CAROLINA).
Results:
Glimepiride was shown to have a non-inferior risk compared to placebo for 3-point MACE (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.850, 1.274), all-cause mortality (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.880, 1.317), CV death (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.732, 1.259), and non-CV death (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.893, 1.733).
Conclusion:
Cardiovascular safety of glimepiride is re-assuring and may help patients with type 2 diabetes world-over to avail the benefit of this affordable efficacious medication.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications

