Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Risk of Coronary Obstruction Due to Sinus Sequestration in Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Tomoki Ochiai1, Luke Oakley2, Navjot Sekhon2
1Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.
Insights
Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Evolut valves poses a higher risk of coronary obstruction from sinus sequestration compared to SAPIEN 3 valves. Careful CT screening is crucial, especially with low sinotubular junction height, to mitigate risks in future redo TAVR procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration is a potential complication in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
- Limited data exists on the specific risks associated with different TAV prostheses in redo TAVR procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the risk of coronary obstruction from sinus sequestration in patients undergoing redo TAVR.
- To compare this risk between Evolut R/PRO and SAPIEN 3 valve types using post-procedural computed tomography (CT).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of post-TAVR CT scans from 66 patients with Evolut R/PRO and 345 patients with SAPIEN 3 valves.
- Definition of sinus sequestration risk based on prior TAV commissure level relative to the sinotubular junction (STJ) and distance between TAV and STJ.
Main Results:
- A significantly higher CT-identified risk of sinus sequestration was observed in the Evolut R/PRO group (45.5%) compared to the SAPIEN 3 group (2.0%) (p < 0.001).
- Specific risks for left and right coronary arteries were higher with Evolut valves (39.4% and 24.2%, respectively) versus SAPIEN 3 (2.0% and 0.6%).
- Overlaps between prior TAV commissural posts and coronary ostia were more frequent in the Evolut group (45.2%) than the SAPIEN 3 group (11.1%) among at-risk coronary arteries.
Conclusions:
- The risk of sinus sequestration in redo TAVR necessitates careful CT screening, particularly in patients with low STJ height.
- TAVs designed for commissure-to-commissure alignment with native valves may reduce the risk of coronary obstruction and facilitate future leaflet laceration procedures.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using post-TAVR computed tomography (CT).
Background:
Little information is available regarding the risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration in redo TAVR inside a previously implanted TAV.
Methods:
Post-TAVR CT of 66 patients who received an Evolut R or Evolut PRO and 345 patients who received a SAPIEN 3 were analyzed. Redo TAVR was considered at risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration if: 1) the prior TAV commissure level was above sinotubular junction (STJ); and 2) the distance between TAV and STJ was <2.0 mm in each coronary sinus.
Results:
In total, 45.5% in the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group and 2.0% in the SAPIEN 3 group had CT-identified risk of sinus sequestration at 1 or both coronary arteries (p < 0.001). CT-identified risk of sinus sequestration was observed in 39.4% for the left coronary artery and 24.2% for the right coronary artery in the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, while those percentages were 2.0% for the left coronary artery and 0.6% for the right coronary artery in the SAPIEN 3 group. In a coronary-level analysis, overlaps between the first TAV commissural posts and coronary ostium were observed in 45.2% in the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group and 11.1% in in the SAPIEN 3 group among coronary arteries at CT-identified risk of sinus sequestration.
Conclusions:
The risk of sinus sequestration in redo TAVR should be carefully screened by CT, especially in patients with low STJ height. TAV with low commissure height that was designed to achieve commissure-to-commissure alignment with the native aortic valves may be preferable to avoid the risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration and allow for a preventive leaflet laceration procedure in future redo TAVR. (Assessment of TRanscathetEr and Surgical Aortic BiOprosthetic Valve Thrombosis and Its TrEatment With Anticoagulation [RESOLVE]; NCT02318342).
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

