Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025
Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Functional Recovery Rate: A Feasible Method for Evaluating and Comparing Rehabilitation Outcomes Between Skilled
Joshua K Johnson1, Jessica Hohman2, Mary Stilphen3
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Objectives:
The recovery of patients' physical function and the rate at which this occurs are important parameters for evaluating value in post-acute care (PAC). However, no metrics are presently used to compare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) based on the functional recovery rates (FRRs) for patients in their care. The objectives of this study were to examine whether the average FRR differed significantly among SNFs and to compare the FRR to other measures currently used to assess care quality in SNFs.
Design:
Retrospective observational study.
Setting And Participants:
3913 patients discharged from hospitals in one health system to one of 10 partner SNFs between January 2017 and September 2019.
Methods:
The FRR-the difference in Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care 6-Clicks basic mobility score from SNF admission to discharge relative to the SNF length of stay (in days)-was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included metrics from the SNF Quality Reporting Program (functional recovery alone, discharge to the community, and 30-day hospital readmission). Differences in patients' outcomes between SNFs were tested using multiple regression in order to adjust for patient characteristics.
Results:
Across the 10 SNFs, the highest adjusted mean FRR was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55, 0.90] and the lowest was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.46) points per day. Two SNFs had an adjusted mean FRR statistically higher, and 2 had an FRR statistically lower, than the sample mean (0.50, 95% CI: 0.48-0.52). SNF rankings varied by metric.
Conclusions And Implications:
Individual SNFs vary in their mean FRR for patients making it a potentially useful measure of value for comparing SNFs. Standardized measurement and reporting of FRR could be beneficial to patients and their families as they consider specific SNFs for necessary post-acute rehabilitation and to hospital systems seeking to identify high-value PAC providers with whom to partner in collaborative care models.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:19Restorative Care
01:17Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...