Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Investigating Aortic Valve Calcification via Isolation and Culture of T Lymphocytes using Feeder Cells from Irradiated Buffy Coat
Published on: February 4, 2021
Incidence and Predictors of Structural Valve Deterioration after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic
Yu-Xiang Long1, Zeng-Zhang Liu1
1Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Background:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), widely used as an alternative therapy in patients with severe aortic stenosis, is expected to be offered to low-risk patents with a longer life expectancy. The durability of transcatheter aortic valve is becoming of increasing importance.
Method:
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from the inception to March 2020 were systematically screened for studies reporting on structural valve deterioration (SVD) in TAVR patients. Incidence of SVD was diagnosed according to the latest European consensus as the primary end point. Predictors of SVD evaluated at multivariable analysis and cumulative incidence function (CIF) of SVD were the secondary end point.
Result:
Twelve studies encompassing 10031 patients evaluating the incidence of SVD were included, with a follow-up between 1 and 8 years. The pooled incidence of SVD was 4.93% (95% CI, 2.75%-7.70%, I 2 = 96%) at 1 year and 8.97% (95% CI, 6.89%-11.29%, I 2 = 86%) in the long term (≥5 years). Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the valve type that may result in partial heterogeneity. SVD was more frequent in patents with a valve diameter of <26 mm (HR: 3.57, 1.47-8.69), oral anticoagulants (OAC), exposure at discharge (OR: 0.48, 0.38-0.61), or by a disease of renal dysfunction (OR 1.42, 1.03-1.96).
Conclusion:
SVD represents infrequent events after TAVR in the long term (>5 years), occurring more commonly in renal dysfunction patients, with small valve diameter and without OAC exposure. There may be an underestimation of the incidence if we assume death as a competing risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

