Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

04:51
Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: April 11, 2019
9.9K
Quantitative Infrared Pupillometry in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus.
Jana Godau1,2, Claudia Bierwirth3, Johannes Rösche3,4
1Department of Neurology, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Germany. jana.godau@klinikum-kassel.de.
Neurocritical Care
|November 20, 2020
Summary
Neurological pupil index (NPi) was significantly reduced in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Infrared pupillometry may aid in diagnosing NCSE, with specific NPi cut-offs showing diagnostic potential.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Critical Care Medicine
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a common yet challenging diagnosis in neurocritical care settings.
- Pupil function alterations are observed in NCSE patients, but their variability complicates diagnosis.
- Infrared pupillometry offers a sensitive method to detect subtle changes in pupil function, with the neurological pupil index (NPi) serving as a potential global marker.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the neurological pupil index (NPi) is altered in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of NPi parameters in identifying NCSE.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional observational study involving 103 adult emergency patients with suspected seizures and EEG indication for NCSE exclusion.
- Pupillometry was performed before EEG recording, and NCSE diagnosis was established using Salzburg consensus criteria.
- Statistical analysis included group comparisons of NPi values (right, left, minNPi, diffNPi) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for diagnostic cut-offs.
Main Results:
- Significantly lower NPi values (right, left, minNPi) and a higher difference between left and right NPi (diffNPi) were observed in patients with confirmed or possible NCSE compared to those without NCSE.
- ROC analysis identified optimal cut-offs: minNPi of 4.0 (AUC=0.93) and diffNPi of 0.2 (AUC=0.89) for NCSE diagnosis.
- No significant difference in minNPi or diffNPi was found between confirmed and possible NCSE groups.
Conclusions:
- Reduced NPi and increased inter-pupil NPi difference are significant indicators in confirmed NCSE.
- NPi values below 4.0 or an NPi difference greater than 0.2 may serve as potential diagnostic markers for NCSE.
- Infrared pupillometry, using NPi, shows promise as a valuable tool for NCSE assessment, warranting further investigation in larger cohorts.

