Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Physicians' satisfaction with clinical referral laboratories in Rwanda
Vincent Rusanganwa1,2,3, Jean Bosco Gahutu1, Anna-Karin Hurtig4
1College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda , Kigali, Rwanda.
Background:
The quality of laboratory services is crucial for quality of patient care. Clinical services and physicians' decisions depend largely on laboratory test results for appropriate patients' management. Therefore, physicians' satisfaction with laboratory services is a key measurement of the quality service that stresses impactful laboratory service improvement to benefit patients.
Objective:
To assess physicians' satisfaction and perspectives on the quality of services in clinical referral laboratories in Rwanda.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey among physicians from four referral hospitals with closed-ended questionnaire and one general open-ended question. A five-point Likert scale rating was used to measure satisfaction. Descriptive, ordered logistic regression, and thematic analysis were used.
Results:
In total, 462 of 507 physicians (91% response rate) participated in the study. Overall mean satisfaction was 3.2 out of 5, and 36.2% of physicians were satisfied (satisfied and strongly satisfied) with laboratory services. In four service categories out of 17, the physicians' satisfaction was over 50%. The categories were: reliability of results (69.9%), adequacy of test reports (61.9%), laboratory staff availability (58.4%), and laboratory leadership responsiveness (51.3%). Lowest satisfaction was seen for routine test turnaround time (TAT) (19.3%), in-patient stat (urgent) test TAT (27%), communication of changes such as reagent stock out, new test (29%), and missing outpatient results (31%). Eighty-four percent answered that test TAT was not communicated, and 73.4% lacked virology diagnostics. Pediatricians, internists, and more experienced physicians were less satisfied. While ineffective communication, result delays, and service interruption were perceived as dissatisfying patterns, external audits were appreciated for improving laboratory services.
Conclusion:
Availing continuously laboratory tests, timely result reporting, and effective communication between laboratories and clinicians would increase physicians' satisfaction and likely improve the quality of health care. Laboratory staff participation in clinical meetings and ward rounds with physicians may address most of the physicians' concerns.
